Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1087

STIPULATION re 1086 MOTION to Stay for Order Shortening Time by Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Howard, Geoffrey) (Filed on 9/13/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257)
GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468)
HOLLY A. HOUSE (SBN 136045)
ZACHARY J. ALINDER (SBN 209009)
BREE HANN (SBN 215695)
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.2286
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177)
FRED NORTON (SBN 224725)
1999 Harrison St., Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049)
JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227)
500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 5op7
Redwood City, CA 94070
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.506.7144
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc.,
et al.

22

Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784)
Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776)
JONES DAY
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
(650) 739–3900
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
JONES DAY
717 Texas, Suite 3300
Houston, TX 77002
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
(832) 239–3600
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and
TOMORROWNOW, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

23
24

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359)
Jason McDonell (SBN 115084)
Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882)
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
(415) 875–5700
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,

25

Plaintiffs,

26

v.

27

No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
SHORTENING TIME RE ORACLE’S
MOTION FOR STAY; [PROPOSED] ORDER

SAP AG, et al.,

28

Defendants.

STIPULATED REQUEST TO SHORTEN TIME RE ORACLE’S MOTION FOR STAY, CASE NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

1

On September 12, 2011, Plaintiff Oracle International Corporation filed a motion

2

to certify the Post-Trial Order for interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (the

3

“Certification Motion”); and on September 13, Oracle USA, Inc. and Oracle International

4

Corporation (“Oracle”) filed a motion to stay all other case activities and the deadline to accept

5

or reject the remittitur, pursuant to the Court’s September 1, 2011 Post-Trial Order, while the

6

certification motion and any resulting appellate proceedings are pending (the “Stay Motion”).

7

Oracle and Defendants SAP AG, SAP America, Inc., and TomorrowNow, Inc. now stipulate, and

8

ask the Court to order, that the time to hear the Stay Motion be shortened. See N.D. Cal. Civ.

9

Local Rules 6-1, 6-2.

10

The Stay Motion should be heard on shortened time for the reasons stated in the

11

accompanying Declaration of Geoffrey M. Howard in Support of Stipulated Motion to Shorten

12

Time (“Howard Decl.”). In summary, the current deadline for Oracle to accept or reject the

13

remittitur is September 30, 2011. Howard Decl. ¶ 2. The next available time on the Court’s

14

motion calendar is January 11, 2012 (when the Certification Motion will be heard). Unless time

15

is shortened, the Stay Motion cannot be heard until January 2012. Id. ¶ 3. Absent shortened

16

time, Oracle’s deadline to accept or reject the remittitur will pass before the stay motion is heard.

17

Id. ¶ 4. In addition, deadlines for pretrial proceedings or other matters may occur in the months

18

before the stay motion is heard. Id. Since Oracle is seeking a stay of the deadline to accept or

19

reject the remittitur and of pretrial and other deadlines, effective relief cannot be granted unless

20

the Stay Motion is heard before those deadlines pass. Id. Defendants oppose issuance of the

21

stay, but stipulate to the Court hearing the Stay Motion on shortened time. Id. ¶ 5.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATED REQUEST TO SHORTEN TIME RE ORACLE’S MOTION FOR STAY, CASE NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

1

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND

2

REQUEST THE COURT TO ORDER that the briefing schedule and hearing date on Oracle’s

3

Motion to Stay be fixed as follows:

4

September 20

Deadline to file Opposition Brief

5

September 23

Deadline to file Reply Brief

6

September 28

Hearing

7

DATED: September 13, 2011

Bingham McCutchen LLP

8
9
By:

10
11
12

/s/ Geoffrey M. Howard
Geoffrey M. Howard
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., et al.

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Rule X, the above signatory attests that

13

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.

14

DATED: September 13, 2011

Jones Day

15
By:

16

/s/ Tharan Gregory Lanier
Tharan Gregory Lanier
Attorneys for Defendants
SAP AG, et al.

17
18
19
20
21

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: _______________, 2011
Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
United States District Court Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATED REQUEST TO SHORTEN TIME RE ORACLE’S MOTION FOR STAY, CASE NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)