Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1087

STIPULATION re 1086 MOTION to Stay for Order Shortening Time by Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Howard, Geoffrey) (Filed on 9/13/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257) GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468) HOLLY A. HOUSE (SBN 136045) ZACHARY J. ALINDER (SBN 209009) BREE HANN (SBN 215695) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: 415.393.2000 Facsimile: 415.393.2286 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200 Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177) FRED NORTON (SBN 224725) 1999 Harrison St., Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1000 Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049) JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227) 500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 5op7 Redwood City, CA 94070 Telephone: 650.506.4846 Facsimile: 650.506.7144 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., et al. 22 Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784) Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776) JONES DAY 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 739–3939 Facsimile: (650) 739–3900 Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) JONES DAY 717 Texas, Suite 3300 Houston, TX 77002 Telephone: (832) 239–3939 Facsimile: (832) 239–3600 Attorneys for Defendants SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and TOMORROWNOW, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 23 24 Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359) Jason McDonell (SBN 115084) Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882) JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 626–3939 Facsimile: (415) 875–5700 ORACLE USA, INC., et al., 25 Plaintiffs, 26 v. 27 No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL) STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME RE ORACLE’S MOTION FOR STAY; [PROPOSED] ORDER SAP AG, et al., 28 Defendants. STIPULATED REQUEST TO SHORTEN TIME RE ORACLE’S MOTION FOR STAY, CASE NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL) 1 On September 12, 2011, Plaintiff Oracle International Corporation filed a motion 2 to certify the Post-Trial Order for interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (the 3 “Certification Motion”); and on September 13, Oracle USA, Inc. and Oracle International 4 Corporation (“Oracle”) filed a motion to stay all other case activities and the deadline to accept 5 or reject the remittitur, pursuant to the Court’s September 1, 2011 Post-Trial Order, while the 6 certification motion and any resulting appellate proceedings are pending (the “Stay Motion”). 7 Oracle and Defendants SAP AG, SAP America, Inc., and TomorrowNow, Inc. now stipulate, and 8 ask the Court to order, that the time to hear the Stay Motion be shortened. See N.D. Cal. Civ. 9 Local Rules 6-1, 6-2. 10 The Stay Motion should be heard on shortened time for the reasons stated in the 11 accompanying Declaration of Geoffrey M. Howard in Support of Stipulated Motion to Shorten 12 Time (“Howard Decl.”). In summary, the current deadline for Oracle to accept or reject the 13 remittitur is September 30, 2011. Howard Decl. ¶ 2. The next available time on the Court’s 14 motion calendar is January 11, 2012 (when the Certification Motion will be heard). Unless time 15 is shortened, the Stay Motion cannot be heard until January 2012. Id. ¶ 3. Absent shortened 16 time, Oracle’s deadline to accept or reject the remittitur will pass before the stay motion is heard. 17 Id. ¶ 4. In addition, deadlines for pretrial proceedings or other matters may occur in the months 18 before the stay motion is heard. Id. Since Oracle is seeking a stay of the deadline to accept or 19 reject the remittitur and of pretrial and other deadlines, effective relief cannot be granted unless 20 the Stay Motion is heard before those deadlines pass. Id. Defendants oppose issuance of the 21 stay, but stipulate to the Court hearing the Stay Motion on shortened time. Id. ¶ 5. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATED REQUEST TO SHORTEN TIME RE ORACLE’S MOTION FOR STAY, CASE NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL) 1 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND 2 REQUEST THE COURT TO ORDER that the briefing schedule and hearing date on Oracle’s 3 Motion to Stay be fixed as follows: 4 September 20 Deadline to file Opposition Brief 5 September 23 Deadline to file Reply Brief 6 September 28 Hearing 7 DATED: September 13, 2011 Bingham McCutchen LLP 8 9 By: 10 11 12 /s/ Geoffrey M. Howard Geoffrey M. Howard Attorneys for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., et al. In accordance with General Order No. 45, Rule X, the above signatory attests that 13 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. 14 DATED: September 13, 2011 Jones Day 15 By: 16 /s/ Tharan Gregory Lanier Tharan Gregory Lanier Attorneys for Defendants SAP AG, et al. 17 18 19 20 21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: _______________, 2011 Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Court Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATED REQUEST TO SHORTEN TIME RE ORACLE’S MOTION FOR STAY, CASE NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?