Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1101

ORDER DENYING AMENDED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton denying 1099 Motion to Intervene (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359)
Jason McDonell (SBN 115084)
Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882)
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784)
Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776)
JONES DAY
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
JONES DAY
717 Texas, Suite 3300
Houston, TX 77002
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and
TOMORROWNOW, INC.

19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

21

OAKLAND DIVISION

22
23

ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,

24

Plaintiffs,

25

v.

26

Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
AMENDED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
INTERVENE

SAP AG, et al.,
Defendants.

27
28
SVI-100930v1

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING AMENDED MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE
Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

1
2

Having considered the papers filed in connection with pro se plaintiff Terry M. Myers’
Amended Motion for Leave to Intervene (“Amended Motion”):

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The Amended Motion is DENIED.

4

Rule 24(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[a] motion to intervene

5

must . . . state the grounds for intervention and be accompanied by a pleading that sets out the

6

claim or defense for which invention is sought.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(c). Despite including new

7

allegations, the Amended Motion remains incomprehensible—largely repeating the allegations of

8

the original motion to intervene—and again wholly fails to state any basis for intervention as

9

required by the Federal Rules.

10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12
13

By:

UNIT
ED

December 12, 2011
DATED: ________________________

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

RED

H

ER

18

Hamilton

LI

RT

Judge P

FO

hyllis J.

NO

17

R NIA

E
O ORD
Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
IT IS S

16

A

15

S

14

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SVI-100930v1

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING AMENDED MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE
Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)