Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1101

ORDER DENYING AMENDED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton denying 1099 Motion to Intervene (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359) Jason McDonell (SBN 115084) Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882) JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com jmcdonell@jonesday.com ewallace@jonesday.com Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784) Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776) JONES DAY 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 739-3939 Facsimile: (650) 739-3900 tglanier@jonesday.com jfroyd@jonesday.com Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) JONES DAY 717 Texas, Suite 3300 Houston, TX 77002 Telephone: (832) 239-3939 Facsimile: (832) 239-3600 swcowan@jonesday.com jlfuchs@jonesday.com Attorneys for Defendants SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and TOMORROWNOW, INC. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 OAKLAND DIVISION 22 23 ORACLE USA, INC., et al., 24 Plaintiffs, 25 v. 26 Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING AMENDED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE SAP AG, et al., Defendants. 27 28 SVI-100930v1 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING AMENDED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) 1 2 Having considered the papers filed in connection with pro se plaintiff Terry M. Myers’ Amended Motion for Leave to Intervene (“Amended Motion”): 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The Amended Motion is DENIED. 4 Rule 24(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[a] motion to intervene 5 must . . . state the grounds for intervention and be accompanied by a pleading that sets out the 6 claim or defense for which invention is sought.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(c). Despite including new 7 allegations, the Amended Motion remains incomprehensible—largely repeating the allegations of 8 the original motion to intervene—and again wholly fails to state any basis for intervention as 9 required by the Federal Rules. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 By: UNIT ED December 12, 2011 DATED: ________________________ S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O RED H ER 18 Hamilton LI RT Judge P FO hyllis J. NO 17 R NIA E O ORD Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton IT IS S 16 A 15 S 14 N F D IS T IC T O R C 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SVI-100930v1 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING AMENDED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?