Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1122

MOTION for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Saved Development Costs filed by Oracle International Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Oracle's Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Saved Development Costs)(Howard, Geoffrey) (Filed on 4/17/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257)
GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468)
BREE HANN (SBN 215695)
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.2286
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177)
FRED NORTON (SBN 224725)
1999 Harrison St., Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049)
JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227)
500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 5op7
Redwood City, CA 94070
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.506.7144
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Oracle International Corp.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

20
21
22

ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

23

v.

24

SAP AG, et al.,

25

No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ORACLE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
REGARDING SAVED DEVELOPMENT
COSTS

Defendants.

26
27
28
NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ORACLE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION REGARDING
SAVED DEVELOPMENT COSTS

1

Before the Court is Oracle’s Motion for Leave to File a Motion for

2

Reconsideration Regarding Saved Development Costs (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiffs Oracle

3

International Corporation (“Oracle”). After considering the pleadings, memoranda, and

4

supporting papers submitted by the Parties, and having heard the arguments of counsel, IT IS

5

HEREBY ORDERED that Oracle’s Motion is GRANTED.

6
7
8

At the retrial, Oracle will be allowed to submit evidence of SAP’s saved
development costs in support of the hypothetical license valuation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

DATED: _______________, 2012
Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
United States District Court Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

NO. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ORACLE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION REGARDING
SAVED DEVELOPMENT COSTS