Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1191

REPLY (re 1184 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ) filed byOracle International Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jennifer Gloss in Support of Plaintiff's Response in Support of Defendants' Administrative Motion to Permit Defendants to File Under Seal Oracles Information in Support of the Parties Joint Statement Regarding Exhibit Objections, # 2 Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Administrative Motion to Permit Defendants to File Under Seal Oracles Information in Support of the Parties Joint Statement Regarding Exhibit Objections)(Howard, Geoffrey) (Filed on 6/12/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257)
GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468)
BREE HANN (SBN 215695)
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.2286
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177)
FRED NORTON (SBN 224725)
1999 Harrison St., Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049)
JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227)
500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 5op7
Redwood City, CA 94070
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.506.7144
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Oracle International Corp.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

20
21
22

ORACLE INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION,

23

Plaintiff,

24

v.

25

SAP AG, et al.,

26

Defendants.

No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO PERMIT DEFENDANTS TO
FILE UNDER SEAL ORACLE’S
INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE
PARTIES’ JOINT STATEMENT
REGARDING EXHIBIT OBJECTIONS

27
28
Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO PERMIT DEFENDANTS TO FILE UNDER SEAL
ORACLE’S INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE PARTIES’ JOINT STATEMENT REGARDING EXHIBIT OBJECTIONS

1

Pending before this Court is Defendants SAP AG, SAP America, Inc., and

2

TomorrowNow, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Administrative Motion to Permit Defendants

3

to File Under Seal Oracle’s Information in Support of the Parties’ Joint Statement Regarding

4

Exhibit Objections (“Administrative Motion”).

5

Having considered (1) Defendants’ Administrative Motion; (2) Defendants’

6

supporting declaration; (3) the Stipulation to Permit Defendants to File under Seal Oracle’s

7

Information in Support of the Parties’ Joint Statement Regarding Exhibit Objections; (4) the

8

Parties’ Joint Statement Regarding Exhibit Objections; (5) Plaintiff’s Response in Support of

9

Defendants’ Administrative Motion; and (6) the Declaration of Jennifer Gloss in Support of

10

Plaintiff’s Response, and having found good cause and compelling reason in support of the

11

Administrative Motion:

12

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants’ Administrative Motion is

13

GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall file under seal the unredacted version of Defendants’

14

Trial Brief and shall redact from the public version the following page and line numbers: 9:14-

15

17; 12:6-10; 13:6-10; 14:21; 17:10-12; 18:6-9; 19:3-5; 21:11-14; 22:9-16; 25:6-8; 27:9-14;

16

32:18-27; 34:9-14; 34:25; 35:17; 35:21-27; 36:6-7; 36:28-37:4; 37:22-23; 38:6-9; 39:18-23;

17

39:28-40:2; and 40:4-6.

18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20
21

DATED: _______________, 2012
Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton
United States District Court Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO PERMIT DEFENDANTS TO FILE UNDER SEAL
ORACLE’S INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE PARTIES’ JOINT STATEMENT REGARDING EXHIBIT OBJECTIONS