Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 487

Declaration of Paul Meyer in Support of 483 Memorandum in Opposition, Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Plaintiffs' Hypothetical [Fair Market Value] License Damages Claim filed byOracle EMEA Limited, Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc., Siebel Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment A, # 2 Attachment B, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit 3, # 6 Exhibit 4, # 7 Exhibit 5, # 8 Exhibit 6, # 9 Exhibit 7, # 10 Exhibit 8, # 11 Exhibit 9, # 12 Exhibit 10, # 13 Exhibit 11, # 14 Exhibit 12, # 15 Exhibit 13, # 16 Exhibit 14, # 17 Exhibit 15, # 18 Exhibit 16, # 19 Exhibit 17, # 20 Exhibit 18, # 21 Exhibit 19, # 22 Exhibit 20, # 23 Exhibit 21, # 24 Exhibit 22, # 25 Exhibit 23, # 26 Exhibit 24, # 27 Exhibit 25, # 28 Exhibit 26, # 29 Exhibit 27, # 30 Exhibit 28, # 31 Exhibit 29, # 32 Exhibit 30, # 33 Exhibit 31, # 34 Exhibit 32, # 35 Exhibit 33, # 36 Exhibit 34, # 37 Exhibit 35, # 38 Exhibit 36, # 39 Exhibit 37, # 40 Exhibit 38, # 41 Exhibit 39, # 42 Exhibit 40, # 43 Exhibit 41, # 44 Exhibit 42, # 45 Exhibit 43, # 46 Exhibit 44, # 47 Exhibit 45, # 48 Exhibit 46, # 49 Exhibit 47, # 50 Exhibit 48, # 51 Exhibit 49, # 52 Exhibit 50, # 53 Exhibit 51, # 54 Exhibit 52, # 55 Exhibit 53, # 56 Exhibit 54, # 57 Exhibit 55, # 58 Exhibit 56, # 59 Exhibit 57, # 60 Exhibit 58, # 61 Exhibit 59, # 62 Exhibit 60, # 63 Exhibit 61, # 64 Exhibit 62, # 65 Exhibit 63, # 66 Exhibit 64, # 67 Exhibit 65, # 68 Exhibit 66, # 69 Exhibit 67, # 70 Exhibit 68, # 71 Exhibit 69, # 72 Exhibit 70, # 73 Exhibit 71, # 74 Exhibit 72, # 75 Exhibit 73)(Related document(s) 483 ) (House, Holly) (Filed on 9/23/2009)

Download PDF
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al Doc. 487 Att. 1 Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document487-2 Filed09/23/09 Page1 of 4 T PAUL K. MEYER ATTACHMENT B ESTIMONY IN LAST FOUR YEARS (JULY 2005 PRESENT) Acco Brands, Inc., d/b/a/ Kensington Technology Group v. ABA Locks Manufacturer Co., Ltd., and Belkin Components n r e t s a E e h t r o f t r u o C t c i r t s i 5 D 0 s 0 e 2 t , a ) t l S a i r d T e t , i n n o i U t i e s h o t p e n I D ( , n o i s i v i D l l a h s r a M , s a x e T f o t c i r t s i D In The Matter Of: Certain Baseband Processor Chips and Chipsets, Transmitter And Receiver (Radio) Chips, Power Control Chips And Products Containing Same, Including Cellular Telephone Handsets (Kyocera Wireless Corporation) n d e o t t i g n n i U h s , a W , 3 4 5 A T 7 3 3 r e b m u N n o i t a g i t s e v n I n o i s s i m m o 6 0 C 0 e 2 , d ) a l r a i T r l T a , n n o o i i t t a i s n o r e p t e n I D ( s , . e t C a . t D S Certain High-Brightness Light Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same (Lumileds Lighting U.S., L.L.C.), n o i s s i m m o C e d 6 a r 0 0 T 2 l , ) a n n o o i i t t i a s n o r p e e t n D I ( , . s C e . t a D t S n o t d g e t n i i n h s U a W , 6 5 5 A T 7 3 3 r e b m u N n o i t a g i t s e v n I NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. Dockets.Justia.com e h t f o t r u o C r o i r e 6 p 0 u 0 S 2 , e ) h n t o i n t I New World TMT Ltd. v. Prediwave Corporation, et al., i s o p e D ( a r a l C a t n a S f o y t n u o C r o f d n a n i a i n r o f i l a C f o e t a t S n o i t a r t i b r A n a c i r e m A CGI-AMS Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, 6 0 0 2 , ) n o i t i s o p e D ( n o i t a i c o s s A , t ) c l i a r i t r s i T , D n s o e i t t i a s t o S p e d e D t ( i n n o U i s e i h v i t D n I Samsung Electronics, Inc. v. Compal Electronics, Inc. o c , s i c n a r F n a S , a i n r o f i l a C f o t c i r t s i D n r e h t r o N e h t r o f t r 6 u 0 o 0 C 2 t r u o C t c i 6 r 0 t s 0 i 2 D , ) s n e t o i a t t i s S o d p e e t i D n ( U n e o i h s t i v n i I Samsung Electronics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc. , D o c s i c n a r F n a S , a i n r o f i l a C f o t c i r t s i D n r e h t r o N e h t r o f , h a t U f o t c i r t s i D e h t r o f t r u o C t c i r t s i D s e t a t S d e t i n U 5 0 e 0 h 2 t , ) n I SEC v. Gary D. Kennedy, n o i t i s o p e D ( n o i s i v i D l a r t n e C d n a n i a i n r o f i l a C 8 f 0 o 0 e 2 t , a ) t n S o i e t i h t s o f o p e t r D u ( , o 5 C 0 r 0 o 2 i , r ) e l a p i u r S T , e n h t o i t n i I s Waltrip, et al. v. Kimberlin, et al., o p e D ( o c s i c n a r F n a S f o y t n u o C r o f n o i s i v i D o c s i c n a r F n a S , a i n r o f i l a C f o t c i r t s i 7 0 o c s i c n a r F n a S , a i n r o f i l a C f o t c i r t s i D n r e n o i s i v i D o c s i c n a r F n a S , a i n r o f i l a C f o n o i s i v i D o c s i c n a r F n a S , a i n r o f i l a C f o t c 6 0 0 2 , ) n 6 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 , ) n o i t i s o Sputtered Films, Inc. v. Sergey Mishin, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Avago Technologies, Inc., et al. e h t r o f d n a n i a i n r o f i l a C f o e t a t S e h t f o 6 0 0 2 , ) l a i r T , n o i t i s o p e D ( s e l e LG.Philips LCD CO., LTD. v. Tatung Co. Of America, Tatung Company And Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD., l a r t n e C e h t r o f t r u o C t c i r t s i D s e t a t S d Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document487-2 Filed09/23/09 Page2 of 4 TESTIMONY IN LAST FOUR YEARS (JULY 2005 PRESENT) ATTACHMENT B Page 2 Mylan v. Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals; f o e t a t S e h t f o t r u o C r o i r e p Lexmark International v. Static Control Components, Inc. t c i r t s i D s e t a t S Informatica Corporation v. Business Objects Data Integration, Inc., d e t i n U e h T n I o i t i s o p e D ( n o i s i v i D n o t g n d e t i n U e h t n I , , ) n o i t i s o p e u S e h t n I p t g e The Boeing Company v. The United States l a r e d e F f o t r u Funai Electric Company, Ltd. v. Daewoo Electronics Corporation, et al., d e t i n U e h T n I 7 o C s e t a t S d e t i n U e h T n Tinkers & Chance v. LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc. r o f t r u o C t c i r Funai Electric Company, Ltd. v. Daewoo Electronics Corporation, et al., d e t i n U e h T n I 0 2 , ) n o i t i s o p e D ( n o i s i v i D o c s i c n t s i D s e t a t S d e t i n U e h T n I h t r o N t c i r t s i 0 0 2 , ) l I , i r t s i i x e L D ( o c e D ( r u o n A t i n U NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. 8 0 0 2 , ) l a i r T ( D n r e h t r o N e h t r o f t r u o C t c i r t s i D s e t a t S a r F n a S , a i n r o f i l a C f o t c i r t s i D n r e h t r o N e h t 7 0 0 2 , ) l a i r T , n o i t i s o p e D ( n o i s i v i D e h t r o f t r u o C t c i r t s i D s e t a t S d e t i n U e h T n I Boston Scientific Corporation, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson And Cordis Corporation, 7 0 0 2 , ) n o i t i s o p e D ( D n r e h t r o N e h t r o f t r u o C t c i r t s i D s e t a t S a i r T , n o i t i s o p e D ( . C . D n o t g n i h s a W , s m i a l C ; 7 0 0 2 , ) l a i r T ( 6 0 0 2 , ) n o i t i s o p e D ( D n r e h t r o N e h t r o f t r u o C t c i r t s i D s e t a t S , y k c u t n e K f o t c i r t s i D n r e t s a E e h t r o f t r u o C s i c n a r F n a S f o y t n u o C r o f d n a n i a i n r o f i l a C n o i s i v i D a p a c a n A , a r a b r a B a t n a S f o y t n u o C C r o i r e p u S e h t n I , s o L n o i s i v i D n r e t s e W , a i n r o f i l a C f o t c i r t s i D e h t n I 9 0 0 2 , ) n o i t i s o p e D ( n o i s i v i D s i l o p a n a i d n I 9 0 0 2 , 8 0 0 2 , ) n o i t i s o Fair Isaac Corporation; and myFICO Consumer Services, Inc. v. Equifax, Inc.; Equifax Information Services LLC; Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al., d e t i n U e h t n I 8 0 0 2 , ) n o i t i s o p e D ( n o i s i v i D o c s i c n a r F 8 0 0 2 , ) n o i t a r t i b r A , n o i t i s o p e D ( A C , o c s i c n ; 9 0 0 2 , ) l a i r T ( 8 0 0 2 , ) n o i t i s o p e D ( s e l e g n A s o L f o y t , A C , e d i s r e v i R n o i s i v i D e s o J n a S , a i First National Mortgage Company v. Federal Realty Investment Trust, d e t i n U e h T n I Unilever U.K. Central Resources Ltd., et al. v. Concat L.P.,et al. , t r u o C n o d n o L e h T n I Bally's Gaming Inc. v. International Game Technology ("IGT") s e t a t S d e t i n U e h t n I , 8 0 0 2 , n r o f i l a C Carter Bryant v. Mattel, Inc., and Consolidated Actions t c i r t s i D s e t a t S d e t i n U e h t Auerbach Acquisition Associates, Inc. v. Greg Daily, etc., e h t f o t r u o C r o i r e p u S e h t n I n o i s i v i D n r e t s a E , a i n r n I , 8 0 0 2 , ) n o i t i s o , ) n o i t a r t i b r A ( . K . f o t c i r t s i D n r e Biogen Idec Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. l a i c r e m m o C , n o i t a i c o s s A n o i t a r t i b r A n a c i r e m A , n u o C e h t o f i l a C f o t p e D ( a d a v U , n o d n o L h t r o N e h t Emptoris, Inc. v. Ariba, Inc t c i r t s i D n r e t s a E e h t r o f t r u o C Wistron Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., t c i r t s i D s e t a t S d e t i n U e h t n I 8 0 t c i r t s i D s e Mosaic Systems, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., f o e t a t S e h t f o t r u o C r o i r e Centillion Data Systems, LLC v. Qwest Corporation, et al. t c i r t s i D s e t a t S d e t i n U e h t n I , ) n o i t i s o p e D ( a r a l p u S e h t n I p e D ( n a S , a 0 2 , ) l t a t S NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. , a n a i d n I f o t c i r t s i D n r e h t u o S e h t r o f t r u o C C a t n a S f o y t n u o C e h t r o f d n a n i a i n r o f i l a C a t o s e n n i M f o t c i r t s i D , t r u o C t c i r t s i D s e t a t S i n r o f i l a C f o t c i r t s i D n r e h t r o N e h t r o f t r u o C a i r T , n o i t i s o p e D ( , n o i s i v i D n i k f u L , s a x e T f o d e t i n U e h t n I , . a r F n a S , n o i s i v i D n o i t a r t i b r A r o f d n a n i a i n r o f i l a C f o e t a t S 8 0 0 2 , ) l a i r T , n o i t i s o p e D ( c i r t s i D l a r t n e C e h t r o f t r u o C e N f o t c i r t s i D , t r u o C t c i r t s i D n o i t a r t i b r A l a n o i t a n r e t n I f O 8 0 0 2 , ) l a i r T , n o i t i s o p e D ( r o f t r u o C t c i r t s i D s e t a t S Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document487-2 Filed09/23/09 Page3 of 4 TESTIMONY IN LAST FOUR YEARS (JULY 2005 PRESENT) ATTACHMENT B Page 3 Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document487-2 Filed09/23/09 Page4 of 4 TESTIMONY IN LAST FOUR YEARS (JULY 2005 PRESENT) ATTACHMENT B Page 4 NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. e a r h t a l C n I STMicroelectronics, Inc. v. Eliyahou Harari, SanDisk Corporation, et al. a t n a S f o y t n u o C e h t r o f d n a n i a i n r o f i l a C f o e t a t S e h t f o 9 e t a t S e h t f o t r u o C r o i 9 r 0 e 0 p 2 , u ) S n e o i h t t i s n o I Linear Technology Corp. v. Applied Materials, Inc. p , e D ( a r a l C a t n a S f o y t n u o C e h t r o f d n a n i a i n r o f i l a C f o s 9 e 0 t 0 a 2 t , S ) n d o e i t t i i n s o U p e e h D t ( n n I o Rembrandt Data Technologies, LP v. DirecTV Group Inc., et al. , i s i v i D a i r d n a x e l A , a i n i g r i V f o t c i r t s i D n r e t s a E e h t r 0 t o 0 f r 2 t u , r o ) u n C o o i C r t i t o s i c r i o r e p t p e s i u D D S (

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?