Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 500

Declaration of Holly House in Support of 499 Objection, Oracle's Objections to Order of Discovery Magistrate Granting Defendants' Motion for Preclusion of Certain Damages Evidence Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(c) and 16(f) filed byOracle EMEA Limited, Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc., Siebel Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q)(Related document(s) 499 ) (House, Holly) (Filed on 10/1/2009)

In the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte CIVIL MINUTES Date: September 30, 2009 Case No: C- 07-01658 PJH (EDL) Case Name: ORACLE CORPORATION v. SAP AG, et al Attorneys: Pltf: Geoffrey M. Howard, Bree Haan, Jennifer Gloss Deft: Scott Cowen, Jason McDonell, Elaine Wallace, Louisa Weix FTR Digital Recorder: 2:08pm - 3:11pm (Time: 1 hour 3 min) RULING: Held

Deputy Clerk: Lili M. Harrell PROCEEDINGS: 1. Further Discovery Conference 2. ORDERED AFTER HEARING:

Order to be prepared by: [] Plntf [] Deft [X] Court Case continued to:

Notes:

cc: