Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 729

Declaration of Jason McDonell in Support of 728 MOTION in Limine Defendants' Motions in Limine Declaration of Jason McDonell in Support of Defendants' Motions in Limine filed bySAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X, # 25 Exhibit Y, # 26 Exhibit Z, # 27 Exhibit AA, # 28 Exhibit BB, # 29 Exhibit CC)(Related document(s) 728 ) (Froyd, Jane) (Filed on 8/5/2010)

Download PDF
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al Doc. 729 Att. 2 EXHIBIT B Dockets.Justia.com PAUL K. MEYER May 13, 2010 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 332 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, ORACLE USA, INC., a Colorado corporation, and ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a California corporation, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) No. 07-CV-1658 (PJH) ) SAP AG, a German ) corporation, SAP AMERICA, ) INC., a Delaware ) corporation, TOMORROWNOW, ) INC., a Texas corporation, ) and DOES 1-50, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________) VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF PAUL K. MEYER _________________________________ VOLUME 2; PAGES 332 - 647 THURSDAY, MAY 13, 2010 HIGHLY REPORTED BY: CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY HOLLY THUMAN, CSR No. 6834, RMR, CRR (1-427374) Merrill Legal Solutions (800) 869-9132 3ae7549b-c0d5-4963-b773-f83ce7edfbe0 PAUL K. MEYER May 13, 2010 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 440 11:34:53 11:34:59 11:35:01 11:35:05 11:35:09 11:35:14 11:35:22 11:35:26 11:35:28 11:35:29 11:35:31 11:35:34 11:35:40 11:35:42 11:35:45 11:35:50 11:35:53 11:35:56 11:35:58 11:36:00 11:36:03 11:36:08 11:36:09 11:36:13 11:36:18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q. So there you say that the overall valuation of Oracle's PeopleSoft acquisition was measured using a discounted cash flow model for revenues and profits from PeopleSoft support customers lost to TomorrowNow and SAP, post-October 2008, lost incremental license revenue, upsell, and related support, and lost new license revenue, cross-sell, and related support. Do you see that? A. Q. Yes. What did you mean when you say S&P's overall valuation considered support customers lost to TomorrowNow and SAP? A. What I did there -- and to clarify, there was -- the framework basically, there was something called Project Spice, which was done -- it was a discounted cash flow to support the acquisition of PeopleSoft by Oracle. It was the discounted cash flow model that S&P used. And so what I did was, I took that -MS. HOUSE: THE WITNESS: Slow down. So what I did was, I took that model from Project Spice, and I worked with some data from that, and then S&P -- because we're focusing on the Oracle losses now -- and then I Merrill Legal Solutions (800) 869-9132 3ae7549b-c0d5-4963-b773-f83ce7edfbe0 PAUL K. MEYER May 13, 2010 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY Page 441 11:36:21 11:36:25 11:36:29 11:36:34 11:36:38 11:36:43 11:36:46 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 inserted into that model the information that was from SAP's strategic plans. And so I basically took the potential lost customers for maintenance, cross-sell and upsell, from SAP's strategic plans, and then put that back into Oracle's models. And so that's the intercept that's being described there in the first sentence. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT TO MOTION Merrill Legal Solutions (800) 869-9132 3ae7549b-c0d5-4963-b773-f83ce7edfbe0 PAUL K. MEYER May 13, 2010 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 18:14:29 18:14:33 18:14:34 18:14:37 18:14:39 18:14:40 18:14:44 18:14:47 18:14:49 18:14:51 18:14:51 18:14:51 18: 14 : 55 18:14:57 18:15:07 18:15:09 18:15:27 18:15:29 18:15:29 18:15:29 18:15:29 18:15:29 18:15:29 18:15:29 18:15:29 s o on t h e c o s t a p p r o a c h . MR. McDONELL: that. MS. HOUSE: Thank you. Done. Wrap. You know w h a t We'll wrap for the day with MR. McDONELL: a wrap is? MS. HOUSE: MR. PICKETT: hours tomorrow. MR. McDONELL: MR. PICKETT: yes. D i d we u s e a l l 7 h o u r s - Well, we're only going 7 Well, whoopdee-doo. Okay. I ' l l take that as a THE VIDEO OPERATOR: Going off the record, We're going off t h e t i m e - - t h e t i m e now i s 6 : 1 5 . the videotape record. This also is the conclusion o f T a p e 5 , Volume 2 o f P a u l M e y e r . (Time n o t e d , 6 : 1 5 p . m . ) --000-I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Subscribed at ~evv-. (.;kv'CHY. , Caltfornia, this l"l

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?