Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 767

MOTION No. 3: to Exclude Testimony of Defendants' Expert David Garmus filed by Oracle EMEA Limited, Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc., Siebel Systems, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 9/30/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, Oakland. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Alinder, Zachary) (Filed on 8/19/2010)

Download PDF
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al Doc. 767 Att. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257) GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468) HOLLY A. HOUSE (SBN 136045) ZACHARY J. ALINDER (SBN 215695) BREE HANN (SBN 215695) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: 415.393.2000 Facsimile: 415.393.2286 donn.pickett@bingham.com geoff.howard@bingham.com holly.house@bingham.com zachary.alinder@bingham.com bree.hann@bingham.com BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Telephone: 914.749.8200 dboies@bsfllp.com STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177) 1999 Harrison St., Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: 510.874.1000 sholtzman@bsfllp.com DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049) JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227) 500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 5op7 Redwood City, CA 94070 Telephone: 650.506.4846 Facsimile: 650.506.7114 dorian.daley@oracle.com jennifer.gloss@oracle.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al., No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS' MOTION NO. 3: TO v. EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANTS' EXPERT DAVID SAP AG, et al., GARMUS Defendants. Date: September 30, 2010 Time: 9:00 a.m. Place: 3rd Floor, Courtroom 3 Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOT. NO. 3: TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANTS' EXPERT DAVID GARMUS Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court having before it the Motion of Plaintiffs Oracle USA , Inc. (predecessor to Oracle America, Inc.), Oracle International Corporation, Oracle EMEA Limited and Siebel Systems, Inc. (collectively "Oracle") to Exclude Testimony of Defendants' Expert David Garmus, and having considered the papers and argument of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Testimony of Defendants' Expert David Garmus is GRANTED as follows: 1. Neither Garmus nor any witness relying on Garmus (e.g., Defendants' damages expert, Stephen Clarke) may present or reference or rely on Garmus' opinions and conclusions concerning TomorrowNow's use of Oracle's software. 2. Neither Garmus nor any witness relying on Garmus (e.g., Defendants' damages expert, Stephen Clarke) may present or reference or rely on Garmus' opinions and conclusions relating to the Garmus' claimed function point count of EnterpriseOne 8.0 Accounts Payable and PeopleSoft Enterprise Global Payroll for US 8.9. 3. Neither Garmus nor any witness relying on Garmus (e.g., Defendants' damages expert, Stephen Clarke) may present or reference or rely on Garmus' opinions and conclusions relating to Garmus' claims that neither the International Function Point User's Group nor its membership agree with Pinto's methodology. 4. Neither Garmus nor any witness relying on Garmus (e.g., Defendants' damages expert, Stephen Clarke) may present or reference or rely on Garmus' opinion about whether amounts that SAP would have spent to independently develop relevant software is appropriate for this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: __________________ Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Court Judge Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOT. NO. 3: TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANTS' EXPERT DAVID GARMUS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?