Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 771

MOTION No. 5: To Exclude Testimony of Defendants' Expert Stephen Gray filed by Oracle EMEA Limited, Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc., Siebel Systems, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 9/30/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, Oakland. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Howard, Geoffrey) (Filed on 8/19/2010)

Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Doc. 771 Att. 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP DONN P. PICKETT (SBN 72257) GEOFFREY M. HOWARD (SBN 157468) HOLLY A. HOUSE (SBN 136045) ZACHARY J. ALINDER (SBN 215695) BREE HANN (SBN 215695) Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.393.2286 [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Telephone: [phone] [e-mail] STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (SBN 144177) 1999 Harrison St., Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: [phone] [e-mail] DORIAN DALEY (SBN 129049) JENNIFER GLOSS (SBN 154227) 500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 5op7 Redwood City, CA 94070 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650.506.7114 [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al., v. Plaintiffs, No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION NO. 5: TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANTS' EXPERT STEPHEN GRAY Date: Time: Place: Judge: September 30, 2010 9:00 a.m. 3rd Floor, Courtroom 3 Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

SAP AG, et al., Defendants.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOT. NO. 5: TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANTS' EXPERT STEPHEN GRAY

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The Court having before it the Motion of Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc. (predecessor to Oracle America, Inc.), Oracle International Corporation, Oracle EMEA Limited and Siebel Systems, Inc. (collectively "Oracle" or "Plaintiffs") to Exclude Testimony of Defendants' Expert Stephen Gray, and having considered the papers and argument of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Testimony of Defendants' Expert Stephen Gray is GRANTED as follows: [Either:] 1. Mr. Gray's Appendix 4 submitted with his expert report and all testimony that

refers to or is based on it are excluded pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 702, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and its progeny, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(C)(ii). 2. Mr. Gray's testimony stating that Mr. Mandia did not take certain steps or render

certain opinions in his analysis (Gray Report §§ 6.4.1, 6.4.2, 7.5.1, 7.5.4.1, 7.5.4.2, 7.5.4.3, 7.5.4.4, 7.5.4.5, 7.5.4.6, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 8.1.3, 8.2, 8.2.2, 8.2.3, 8.2.4, 8.5, 8.2.6, 9.3, 9.4.1, 11.2, 11.4.1, 11.4.2, 11.5.1, 11.6, 12.1, 13) is excluded pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702, Daubert, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(C)(ii). 3. Mr. Gray's testimony interpreting licenses and terms of use, or opining on the

propriety of conduct under their terms, is excluded pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 702 and 403, Daubert, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c)(1). 4. Neither Mr. Gray nor any witness relying on Mr. Gray may present or reference

or rely on Mr. Gray's precluded opinions or conclusions. [Or:] 5. Mr. Gray's testimony and exhibits are excluded in their entirety under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c) because of Defendants' failure to make meaningful disclosure, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B)(ii), of materials that Mr. Gray

1

Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOT. NO. 5: TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANTS' EXPERT STEPHEN GRAY

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

considered in forming his opinions. Neither Mr. Gray nor any witness relying on Mr. Gray may present or reference or rely on Mr. Gray's precluded opinions or conclusions

DATED: __________________ Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Court Judge

2

Case No. 07-CV-01658 PJH (EDL)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOT. NO. 5: TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANTS' EXPERT STEPHEN GRAY