Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 796

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Defendants' Administrative Motion to Permit Defendants to File Under Seal Plaintiffs' Documents in Support of Defendants' Daubert Motions and Oppositions to Plaintiffs' Motions in Limine filed by SAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Lee, Jacqueline) (Filed on 8/19/2010)

Download PDF
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al Doc. 796 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359) Jason McDonell (SBN 115084) Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882) JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 ramittelstaedt@jonesday.com jmcdonell@jonesday.com ewallace@jonesday.com Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784) Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776) JONES DAY 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 739-3939 Facsimile: (650) 739-3900 tglanier@jonesday.com jfroyd@jonesday.com Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) JONES DAY 717 Texas, Suite 3300 Houston, TX 77002 Telephone: (832) 239-3939 Facsimile: (832) 239-3600 swcowan@jonesday.com jlfuchs@jonesday.com Attorneys for Defendants SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and TOMORROWNOW, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAP AG, et al., Defendants. Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO PERMIT DEFENDANTS TO FILE UNDER SEAL PLAINTIFFS' DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' DAUBERT MOTIONS AND OPPOSITIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS IN LIMINE SVI-84017v1 DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11(a) and 79-5(c), Plaintiffs Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International Corporation, Oracle EMEA Limited, and Siebel Systems, Inc. ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants SAP AG, SAP America, Inc., and TomorrowNow, Inc. ("Defendants," and together with Plaintiffs, the "Parties") request that the Court order the Clerk of the Court to file under seal, at Plaintiffs' request: (1) portions of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Paul K. Meyer, (2) portions of Exhibits 1, 3, 5, 6, and 20 to the Declaration of Elaine Wallace in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Paul K. Meyer ("Wallace Decl."), (3) portions of Defendants' Oppositions to Plaintiffs' Motions in Limine, and (4) portions of Exhibits 13, 21, 22, 23, and 31 to the Declaration of Tharan Gregory Lanier in Support of Defendants' Oppositions to Plaintiffs' Motions in Limine ("Lanier Decl."), which Defendants will lodge with the Court on August 20, 2010. The requested relief sought is necessary and narrowly tailored to protect the alleged confidentiality of the content of Plaintiffs' documents put at issue by Defendants' Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Paul K. Meyer and Defendants' Oppositions to Plaintiffs' Motions in Limine. This request is supported by the accompanying Stipulation and Declaration of Tharan Gregory Lanier in support of Defendants' Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5, a proposed order and stipulation accompanies this request to file under seal (1) portions of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Paul K. Meyer, (2) portions of Exhibits 1, 3, 5, 6, and 20 to the Wallace Decl., (3) portions of Defendants' Oppositions to Plaintiffs' Motions in Limine, and (4) portions of Exhibits 13, 21, 22, 23, and 31 to the Lanier Decl. DATED: August 19, 2010 JONES DAY By: /s/ Tharan Gregory Lanier Tharan Gregory Lanier Attorneys for Defendants SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and TOMORROWNOW, INC. SVI-84017v1 -1- DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?