Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 880

Declaration of Elaine Wallace in Support of 879 Reply in Support of Defendants Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Paul K. Meyer filed by SAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Related document(s) 879 ) (Wallace, Elaine) (Filed on 9/16/2010) Modified on 9/17/2010 (vlk, COURT STAFF).

Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Doc. 880

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 060359) Jason McDonell (SBN 115084) Elaine Wallace (SBN 197882) JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Tharan Gregory Lanier (SBN 138784) Jane L. Froyd (SBN 220776) JONES DAY 1755 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Scott W. Cowan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Joshua L. Fuchs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) JONES DAY 717 Texas, Suite 3300 Houston, TX 77002 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants SAP AG, SAP AMERICA, INC., and TOMORROWNOW, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAP AG, et al., Defendants. Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) REPLY DECLARATION OF ELAINE WALLACE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF PAUL K. MEYER Date: September 30, 2010 Time: 2:30 p.m. Courtroom: 3, 3rd Floor Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
REPLY WALLACE DECL ISO DEFS.' MOTION TO EXCLUDE MEYER Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

I, ELAINE WALLACE, declare as follows: I am an attorney in the law firm of Jones Day, 555 California St., 26th Floor, San Francisco, California 94104, and counsel of record for Defendants SAP AG, SAP America, Inc. (together, "SAP"), and TomorrowNow, Inc. ("TN") (collectively, "Defendants") in the abovecaptioned matter. I am a member in good standing of the state bar of California and admitted to practice before this Court. I make this declaration based on personal knowledge and, if called upon to do so, could testify competently thereto. Defendants attach the following unpublished cases for the convenience of the court in review of Defendants' Reply In Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Paul K. Meyer. 1. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of Multimatic, Inc. v. Faurecia

Interior Sys. USA, Inc., Nos. 08-1332, 08-1420, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 28156 (6th Cir. Dec. 22, 2009). 2. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of Nilssen v. Motorola, Inc., No.

93 C 6333, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12882 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 14, 1998). 3. Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of from Pierson v. Ford Motor

Co., No. C-06-6503, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111791 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2008). 4. Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of Sunstar, Inc. v. Alberto-Culver,

Inc., No. 01-C-0736, 01-C-5825, 2004 WL 1899927 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 23, 2004). 5. Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of Transclean Corp. v

Bridgewood Servs., Inc., No. 97-2298, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24383 (D. Minn. Jan. 8, 2001). I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 16th day of September, 2010 in San Francisco, California. /s/ Elaine Wallace Elaine Wallace

SFI-650243v1

-1-

REPLY WALLACE DECL ISO DEFS.' MOTION TO EXCLUDE MEYER Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL)