Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
Filing
975
MOTION Enforce Orders Defendants' Motion to Enforce Orders Excluding Evidence and Argument of Lost Cross-Sell and Up-Sell Opportunities and Goodwill filed by SAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B)(Froyd, Jane) (Filed on 11/5/2010)
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
Doc. 975 Att. 3
EXHIBIT B
Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED NORTHERN BEFORE THE HONORABLE
STATES
DISTRICT
COURT
DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA JUDGE
PHYLLIS
ET
HAMILTON
ORACLE CORPORATION
AL NO
0701658
PJH
PLAINTIFFS
VS
SAP
Certified
ET
Copy
AG
AL
DEFENDANTS
PAGES
124
_____________________________
CALIFORNIA OAKLAND WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER
30
2010
TRANSCRIPT
OF PROCEEDINGS
APPEARANCES
FOR
PLAINTIFFS
BOlES
1999
SCHILLER
OAKLAND
HARRISON CALIFORNIA
FLEXNER LLP STREET SUITE 900
94612 ATTORNEY LLP CENTER 94111-4607 AT LAW
BY
STEVEN
HOLTZMAN
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN THREE EMBARCADERO
BY
SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA ZACHARY ALINDER ANTHONY FALZONE HOLLY HOUSE GEOFFREY HOWARD DONN PICKETT ATTORNEYS
AT
LAW
FOR
DEFENDANTS
JONES
DAY
SILICON VALLEY OFFICE 1755 EMBARCADERO ROAD PALO ALTO CALIFORNIA
BY
THARAN
GREGORY
LANIER
94303 ATTORNEY
AT
LAW
APPEARANCES CONTINUED
REPORTED
NEXT CSR
PAGE
BY
RAYNEE
MERCADO
NO
8258
RA YNEE
MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510
451-7530
49
BE
CHARACTERIZED
ASKING THEM
OF
COURSE
THATS
IN
PRECISELY
-- AT
WHAT
THE
JUDGE
LAPORTE
WAS
ABOUT
SOME
INDEED
OF THE
THIS
TIME OF THE CONCERNED WAS BUT THEN
SANCTIONS ABOUT WAS
MOTION
THIS THAT
BUT TO
EVIDENCE OF
THAT
WE
WERE
HE
VERY
TESTIMONY
MR
ELLISON BEING
THAT
CONCERNED THEY
ORACLES REPUTATION DONT WORRY
COME
IN -WE
WAS
BE
HARMED
SAID
WONT
QUANTIFYING HOUR AND
SAY
THAT
THAT
--
NOW
AT NOT
THIS GOING NOT
LATE
TO
ITS
--
ITS
JUST YOUR
IM
USE
THE
ADJECTIVES
TO
IM
AND THEN
THINKING
10
11
OF
NOT
HONOR
TO DO
ITS THIS
AND
BUT
APPROPRIATE
ON WE
COME
IN
SAY
WERE
GOING TURN
NOTHING
GOOD ARE
WILL
GOING
AND
TO
MONTHS ABOUT
WE TO
LATER HARM
TO
AROUND
SAY WELL
MAKE THIS
TESTIFY THAT GOING JURY
12
GOOD WILL NUMBER
TECHNICAL
BUT
DISTINCTION ELSE
ON IS THE
13
14
WONT
HAPPEN
THEIR
HANG
ON
IT
RIGHT GOING
HERE
TO
WHAT IMPACT
OF COURSE ASSESSMENT WOULD
ITS
HAVE
15 16
17
AND
OF DAMAGES ALSO NOTE LIKE THAT THEIR EXPERT
HASNT
QUANTIFIED
IT
IT
THERE
BE
ISNT
ALLOWED
--
ITS
FIGHTING
AIR
YOUR
HONOR
18
CANNOT
19 20 21 22 23
24
MR
OF
PICKETT
NOTHING THING WAY
AS WE
JUST
IN THE
COUPLE OF QUICK RECORD
BE
POINTS
FIRST RULED
IN SHE
ALL
IVE
SEEN
THAT
JUDGE
LAPORTE
THAT
SOME
EVERY
SINGLE BROAD
ON
THAT
TO
COULD
CONSIDERED WAS
OUT
EVIDENCE
BROAD
RULED
GOOD WILL MADE
IS
OF THE
AS TO
CASE THAT
OF
NEVER
THAT
THEY
NEVER THIS YOU
STATEMENT LATE
NO
YOU READ
SAY IF
HOUR
FIRST YOU
ALL
IT IN
IF
25
-- GO BACK
AND
COULD
-- MAYBE
HAVE
RAYNEE
MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510
451-7530
50
MIND
BETTER
IT
THAN
ME
SAY
BUT
IF
YOU
READ ABOUT
TO
THEIR
MOTION
IN IT
LIMINE TALKS
IS
NO
DOESNT
ANYTHING DAMAGES
REPUTATION
ABOUT
QUANTIFYING
DAMAGES
AND
GOOD
WILL
WHICH
MOOT
ISSUE
AS
SAY
THE
COURT
PICKETT
YEAH
AND THEY HAVE TAKEN
IS
MR
DEPOSITION
REPORTS AND AND
SO TO
MR ELLISONS
TO THE
THEYVE ASKED HIM ABOUT
ON AND
GET
REACTION
SO
PRESS
WHAT
IMPACT
THAT
HAS
THEYVE HAD AN
LATE THIS
TO BE
OPPORTUNITY
10
INTO
THIS IT
TRIAL
THERES
AND
BUT SO
NOTHING
IF WE --
HOUR ABOUT
IS NOT
THIS
GOING
THEY
TO BE
KNOW BIG
ALL
ABOUT
IN
11
DEAL
ITS
GOING
LITTLE
12
PIECE
THINK
AND
OF WHEN WITH
IT
IS
MR ELLISONS
HE
TESTIMONY
AND YOU
IT --
13
COMES
ON
YOU CAN
IS
SEE
IT
COME THAT
ON
IF
YOU
14
HAVE
PROBLEM
IT IS --
IT
THE
THINK
RULE
AT
TIME ABOUT THEY
--
15 16
17
IT
AND
TRUTH
SAP DID
WHAT
HAPPENED
ALL KINDS
THEY
CLEARLY AT
THE
-- CLEARLY
THERES
OF INTERIM
DOCUMENTS TOMORROWNOW
TIME
THE
THEY
THIS
THEY
ACQUIRED
18
FOR
VERY
PURPOSE
OF DAMAGING
ORACLES
19 20 21 22 23
24
REPUTATION
THERES IN
THE
ALL
KINDS
OF
DOCUMENTS
AND
SO
THOSE
ALL
COME
COURT
PICKETT
OKAY
AND ALL THEN YOU HAVE
MR
THE
MR
ELLISON
SAYING
--
COURT
RIGHT
OR AND
UNDERSTAND ADOPTED JUDGE
YOUR RESPECTIVE
25
POSITIONS
WHEN
AFFIRMED
LAPORTES
RAYNEE
MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510
451-7530
51
ORDER
IT
WAS NOT
CERTAINLY ONLY
TO
MY INTENTION THERE CLEARLY
BUT
THAT GOING
THERE
TO BE
WOULD
BE
NO
EVIDENCE
DAMAGES EVIDENCE
WAS
NO CLAIM
BE NO
OF
FOR
HARM
GOOD
WILL
THERE
WOULD
ALSO
OF GOOD
WILL
THIS DISTINCTION PROBATIVE FOR THAT VALUE
THE
UNDERSTAND
YOURE MAKING
OF THAT KIND
BUT
DONT
THINK
THAT
YOUR
-- THE THE
SUBSTANTIALLY THAT HEAR
10
OUTWEIGHS
HAS -- HAS -- EVEN
POTENTIAL
OF PREJUDICE JURY
TO TO
COUNSEL ALL
JUST
IF
DESCRIBED
MEAN
IF
FOR
OF THIS
ITS
TO
MINIMAL
OBVIOUSLY
TO
ITS
GOING
COME
FROM
MR ELLISON
BUT
ITS
GOING AS
TO
HAVE
SOME
IN
IMPACT
THE
11
EVIDENCE NOT
HARM
TO
REPUTATION
TO
12
MARKETPLACE
WITHOUT WITHOUT
-IF
THEYRE
THEY
TO
GOING
BE ABLE BY TO
HEAR
THAT PRESENTATION
13
14
ARE
PUT
PERSUADED SOME THINK GIVEN VALUE
YOUR
OVERALL EVEN
WANTING
THAT
IN
VERY
TO
KIND ALLOW
-IT
15 16
17
OF UNCONSCIOUS THAT WAS
WAY
ITS
THAT
IS
VERY VERY
THE
DANGEROUS
IT
IN
NOT
PARTICULARLY
-IT
REASON
WAS
ALLOWED
WAS
DISALLOWED
BECAUSE
THERE
WASNT ADEQUATE
BEEN ADEQUATE
18
DISCLOSURE DISCOVERY
AND
THERE
WASNT
-- OBVIOUSLY
HASNT
19 20 21 22 23
24
OF THIS
AS
ISSUE
UNDERSTAND
ON IT
IT
THE IT
EXPERTS
ARENT
--
ARENT
IN
EVEN ANY
GOING
TO IS
TESTIFY THAT
BECAUSE
50 TO
HASNT WONT
BEEN HAVE
EVALUATED ANY
WAY
CORRECT
WHAT
THE
DO
JURY
DIRECTION
WHATSOEVER
ABOUT
WITH
THAT
BUT THE
PICKETT
REPUTATION WAS
THATS TRUE
WHAT
DAMAGE WAS
TO THE
25
DISCLOSED
WASNT
DISCLOSED
RAYNEE
MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510
451-7530
52
UP-SELL/CROSS-SELL FOR YOUR
OPPORTUNITIES
SO IT
-- AT
LEAST
THATS
THE
BASIS
HONORS ORDER
THE
WAS
DISCLOSED
ABOUT
COURT
IT
ILL
BUT
BUT
THINK
IT
ITS IT
NOT
LIKELY GIVE HER
IM
GOING ORDER
IT AS
TO
ALLOW
IN
ILL
THINK
ABOUT
ILL
ANOTHER
READ
MY UNDERSTANDING WAS
TO
AT
THE
TIME WAS
THAT
WOULD
THE
-- THAT
MY INTENT
PRECLUDE
IT BE
ALL
EVIDENCE
--
AS WELL
DAMAGES
ON
IT
BUT
ILL
IT
GIVE MAY
ANOTHER
-IT
MR
OR RELEVANT
10
PICKETT
OTHER
AND
MAY
BE ADMISSIBLE
FOR THE
PURPOSES
WHAT MAY
BE --
COURT
11
SIMULTANEOUS
COLLOQUY
GAME OF WHACK-A-MOLE THAT
SAP
12
MR MCDONELL
THIS
THE
IS
13
14
MR
ORACLE
AND
PICKETT
FACT ONE TO
INTENDED THINGS
TO
ATTACK
ORACLE
SAYS YEAH
OF THE
THEY ABOUT
DID
WHAT
THEY THEY
15
SUCCEEDED
WERE DOING
THATS BACKGROUND
WITH THE RESPECT
TO
THEIR
KNOWLEDGE
16
17
PURCHASING
TOMORROWNOW
WHAT
COURT NOW
DONT UNDERSTAND
SAYING
--
YOURE
-- WHAT
18
YOURE SAYING YOURE SAYING
YOURE
DONT
UNDERSTAND
WHAT
19 20 21 22 23
24
MR
THE OTHER PURPOSES
PICKETT
PART WHEN
OF -- LET
SAY IT
ME
TRY
BE
AGAIN THEN
ADMISSIBLE
FOR
COURT WHATS
YOU
MAY
THE
IT
THAT ORACLE
FELT ITS
MR
DAMAGED
IN THE
PICKETT
REPUTATION
WAS
MARKETPLACE
25
THE
COURT
OKAY
ALL
RIGHT
ILL
BE
VERY
CLEAR
IN
RAYNEE
MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510
451-7530
53
THE
ORDER
AS TO FOR ALL
WHETHER
-- ANY
OR NOT
IM
GOING
TO
PERMIT
THAT
KIND
OF
TESTIMONY
ANY
PURPOSE
TO THE
RIGHT
TURNING WE
SECOND
ONE
-- WE TO
NEED
TO
MOVE
THINGS
ALONG
THAT
CAUSE
IS THE
HAVE
LOT OF THINGS
GET
THROUGH
-- AND
LOST
PROFITS
ON
MR McDONELL
LIMINE
YES
WE
NO
DEFENDANTS PROBLEM
THAT WAS
MOTION
THE
IN
NO
YOUR
HONOR
IS
HAVE
SIMILAR ORDER
-- THE
BACKGROUND
CLEAR
10
AGAIN
JUDGE
LAPORTES
CRYSTAL
IN
EXCLUDING AND
EVIDENCE THOSE AS ANY ARE
OF CROSS-SELL BASICALLY
TO
AND
UP-SELL OF SOFTWARE
OPPORTUNITIES LICENSES
BECOME
SALES
11
AS WELL
SALES
CUSTOMERS
THAT
HAD
NEVER
12
CUSTOMERS THEY
OF TOMORROWNOW APPEALED
BE
13
14
THAT
TO
ORDER
TO
YOUR THAT
HONOR EXCLUDED
AND ASKED EVIDENCE
BE
THAT
AS
THEIR WAY AND
WITNESSES
ABLE WHY
TALK
ABOUT
15 16
17
OF EXPLAINING LOST PROFITS
THEIR
OTHER
BE
DAMAGES AND
BE
CLAIMS MAY THEY
HIGH YOUR
TO
THE
CLAIM MAY THEIR
LOW
ALSO ASKED
TO
HONOR ALL
SPECIFICALLY IMPACTS
THAT
WITNESSES FROM
ALLOWED
TESTIFY
18
THE
THEY
PERCEIVED
DEFENDANTS
UNLAWFUL
19 20 21 22 23
24
ACTIVITIES
AND OBJECTION
TO WE
CITE
THERE
TO
THEIR
APPLICATION
TO
YOU OR THEIR
YOU AT
ECF499
AND
PAGE WE
16
OBJECTED
SAID OUT
UP
NO
THIS
IS
JUST
KIND
OF
ROUNDABOUT ACTUALLY
TO
WAY BEEN
OF GETTING EXCLUDED
OUT TO
VALUE PROP TALK
OF THE
EVIDENCE DAMAGES
THATS
CLAIMS OR
YOUR
OTHER
25
OUTRIGHT
COME
AND
ABOUT
EXACTLY
WHATS
BEEN
RAYNEE
MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510
451-7530
54
PRECLUDED
AND
YOUR
HONORS ORDER WAS VERY
DIRECTLY OR SO
ONE WE
CLEAR
NO
THAT
THE
WONT DOOR
IN THE
BE SO --
ALLOWED
ISSUE
IN THE --
EITHER
OR
INDIRECTLY UNTIL
THROUGH RECENTLY JURY NOW
BACK
SOLVED
--
THOUGHT
IN
AGAIN
FOR
EXAMPLE JURY
THE
DAMAGES THEY
INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTION CUSTOMERS
OR IN
TO
THEIR
INSTRUCTIONS LOSSES
TO
HAVE
AN
SEEKING UNDER
RECOVER
FOR
PROSPECTIVE
THEIR
INTERFERENCE
CLAIM
WOULD BECAME JUDGE
BE
WELL
THAT
10
PROSPECTIVE
CUSTOMERS AND
BY
THESE
CUSTOMERS NEW ORDER
TO
HAD
NOT
BEEN
ORACLE CUSTOMERS WHAT WAS
-- WERE
CUSTOMERS
THAT THERE
EXACTLY
EXCLUDED
LAPORTES
SALES
11
WONT
OTHER AND
BE
EVIDENCE
THE 358
OR ARGUMENT THAT ARE AT
OF LOST ISSUE
THE
THESE
12
COMPANIES
THAN THEN USES
HERE DOOR THEIR
OPPORTUNITIES AS
13
14
MORE LOST
SUBTLY
THROUGH AND
BACK
DAMAGES FAIRLY WHERE LITTLE UP-SELL
HE
EXPERT
CROSS-SELL
UP-SELL
15
IMPORTANT BASICALLY
-- THAT
CENTERPIECE
SAYS -- AND IS
OF HIS THIS
FAIR-VALUE-OF-USE
US
ANALYSIS
16
17
GETS
BACK TO
GOOD WILL AND
BIT
GOOD WILL
SO
LARGELY
THESE
TO
CROSS-SELL LOSE THAT
18
OPPORTUNITIES
ORACLE WAS
GOING
VALUE
19
TOO
WE
20 21 22 23
24
AGAIN
THINK
THE
THATS
JUST
THE
BACK DOOR AND
HAS
THE
EFFECT
OF EVISCERATING WOULD
SENSE OF JUDGE WITH
LAPORTES
ORDER
SUBMIT
THAT
IS
YOUR ABOUT VALUE VALUE
HONOR
LOST OF USE ORACLE
PICKETT HONOR
EXPERT
IT IS
THIS FAIR AT
THE
NOT
PROFITS
AND PAID
YOUR OUR
ABOUT
THE
MARKET TOTAL
WHETHER
FOR
25
CAN
-- CAN
LOOK
RAYNEE
MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510
451-7530
124
CERTIFICATE RAYNEE STATES
THAT
OF REPORTER OFFICIAL
OF IN ET
MERCADO
DISTRICT
REPORTER
FOR
THE
UNITED
COURT
NORTHERN
CALIFORNIA C07-01658
HEREBY
CERTIFY
THE
FOREGOING
ET
PROCEEDINGS
SAP
PJH
ORACLE
BY
CORPORATION CERTIFIED UNDER
10
AL
AG
AL
WERE
WERE
REPORTED
ME
SHORTHAND DIRECTION AND
OF
REPORTER
INTO TRUE
AND
THEREAFTER
THE
TRANSCRIBED
IS
MY
TYPEWRITING RECORD
OF
THAT
FOREGOING
AS
FULL
ME AT
COMPLETE
THE TIME THE
SAID
PROCEEDINGS
BOUND
BY
11
FILING
OF THE
12
VALIDITY
BE
REPORTERS
CERTIFICATION AND/OR REMOVAL
OF
SAID THE
13
TRANSCRIPT COURT
MAY
VOID
UPON
DISASSEMBLY
FROM
14
FILE
15
16
17
RAYNEE
MERCADO MONDAY
CSR
RMR
CRR
2010
FCRR
CCRR
18
OCTOBER
19
20
21 22 23
24
25
RAYNEE
MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510
451-7530
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?