Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 975

MOTION Enforce Orders Defendants' Motion to Enforce Orders Excluding Evidence and Argument of Lost Cross-Sell and Up-Sell Opportunities and Goodwill filed by SAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B)(Froyd, Jane) (Filed on 11/5/2010)

Download PDF
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al Doc. 975 Att. 3 EXHIBIT B Dockets.Justia.com UNITED NORTHERN BEFORE THE HONORABLE STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JUDGE PHYLLIS ET HAMILTON ORACLE CORPORATION AL NO 0701658 PJH PLAINTIFFS VS SAP Certified ET Copy AG AL DEFENDANTS PAGES 124 _____________________________ CALIFORNIA OAKLAND WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 30 2010 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES FOR PLAINTIFFS BOlES 1999 SCHILLER OAKLAND HARRISON CALIFORNIA FLEXNER LLP STREET SUITE 900 94612 ATTORNEY LLP CENTER 94111-4607 AT LAW BY STEVEN HOLTZMAN BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN THREE EMBARCADERO BY SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA ZACHARY ALINDER ANTHONY FALZONE HOLLY HOUSE GEOFFREY HOWARD DONN PICKETT ATTORNEYS AT LAW FOR DEFENDANTS JONES DAY SILICON VALLEY OFFICE 1755 EMBARCADERO ROAD PALO ALTO CALIFORNIA BY THARAN GREGORY LANIER 94303 ATTORNEY AT LAW APPEARANCES CONTINUED REPORTED NEXT CSR PAGE BY RAYNEE MERCADO NO 8258 RA YNEE MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510 451-7530 49 BE CHARACTERIZED ASKING THEM OF COURSE THATS IN PRECISELY -- AT WHAT THE JUDGE LAPORTE WAS ABOUT SOME INDEED OF THE THIS TIME OF THE CONCERNED WAS BUT THEN SANCTIONS ABOUT WAS MOTION THIS THAT BUT TO EVIDENCE OF THAT WE WERE HE VERY TESTIMONY MR ELLISON BEING THAT CONCERNED THEY ORACLES REPUTATION DONT WORRY COME IN -WE WAS BE HARMED SAID WONT QUANTIFYING HOUR AND SAY THAT THAT -- NOW AT NOT THIS GOING NOT LATE TO ITS -- ITS JUST YOUR IM USE THE ADJECTIVES TO IM AND THEN THINKING 10 11 OF NOT HONOR TO DO ITS THIS AND BUT APPROPRIATE ON WE COME IN SAY WERE GOING TURN NOTHING GOOD ARE WILL GOING AND TO MONTHS ABOUT WE TO LATER HARM TO AROUND SAY WELL MAKE THIS TESTIFY THAT GOING JURY 12 GOOD WILL NUMBER TECHNICAL BUT DISTINCTION ELSE ON IS THE 13 14 WONT HAPPEN THEIR HANG ON IT RIGHT GOING HERE TO WHAT IMPACT OF COURSE ASSESSMENT WOULD ITS HAVE 15 16 17 AND OF DAMAGES ALSO NOTE LIKE THAT THEIR EXPERT HASNT QUANTIFIED IT IT THERE BE ISNT ALLOWED -- ITS FIGHTING AIR YOUR HONOR 18 CANNOT 19 20 21 22 23 24 MR OF PICKETT NOTHING THING WAY AS WE JUST IN THE COUPLE OF QUICK RECORD BE POINTS FIRST RULED IN SHE ALL IVE SEEN THAT JUDGE LAPORTE THAT SOME EVERY SINGLE BROAD ON THAT TO COULD CONSIDERED WAS OUT EVIDENCE BROAD RULED GOOD WILL MADE IS OF THE AS TO CASE THAT OF NEVER THAT THEY NEVER THIS YOU STATEMENT LATE NO YOU READ SAY IF HOUR FIRST YOU ALL IT IN IF 25 -- GO BACK AND COULD -- MAYBE HAVE RAYNEE MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510 451-7530 50 MIND BETTER IT THAN ME SAY BUT IF YOU READ ABOUT TO THEIR MOTION IN IT LIMINE TALKS IS NO DOESNT ANYTHING DAMAGES REPUTATION ABOUT QUANTIFYING DAMAGES AND GOOD WILL WHICH MOOT ISSUE AS SAY THE COURT PICKETT YEAH AND THEY HAVE TAKEN IS MR DEPOSITION REPORTS AND AND SO TO MR ELLISONS TO THE THEYVE ASKED HIM ABOUT ON AND GET REACTION SO PRESS WHAT IMPACT THAT HAS THEYVE HAD AN LATE THIS TO BE OPPORTUNITY 10 INTO THIS IT TRIAL THERES AND BUT SO NOTHING IF WE -- HOUR ABOUT IS NOT THIS GOING THEY TO BE KNOW BIG ALL ABOUT IN 11 DEAL ITS GOING LITTLE 12 PIECE THINK AND OF WHEN WITH IT IS MR ELLISONS HE TESTIMONY AND YOU IT -- 13 COMES ON YOU CAN IS SEE IT COME THAT ON IF YOU 14 HAVE PROBLEM IT IS -- IT THE THINK RULE AT TIME ABOUT THEY -- 15 16 17 IT AND TRUTH SAP DID WHAT HAPPENED ALL KINDS THEY CLEARLY AT THE -- CLEARLY THERES OF INTERIM DOCUMENTS TOMORROWNOW TIME THE THEY THIS THEY ACQUIRED 18 FOR VERY PURPOSE OF DAMAGING ORACLES 19 20 21 22 23 24 REPUTATION THERES IN THE ALL KINDS OF DOCUMENTS AND SO THOSE ALL COME COURT PICKETT OKAY AND ALL THEN YOU HAVE MR THE MR ELLISON SAYING -- COURT RIGHT OR AND UNDERSTAND ADOPTED JUDGE YOUR RESPECTIVE 25 POSITIONS WHEN AFFIRMED LAPORTES RAYNEE MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510 451-7530 51 ORDER IT WAS NOT CERTAINLY ONLY TO MY INTENTION THERE CLEARLY BUT THAT GOING THERE TO BE WOULD BE NO EVIDENCE DAMAGES EVIDENCE WAS NO CLAIM BE NO OF FOR HARM GOOD WILL THERE WOULD ALSO OF GOOD WILL THIS DISTINCTION PROBATIVE FOR THAT VALUE THE UNDERSTAND YOURE MAKING OF THAT KIND BUT DONT THINK THAT YOUR -- THE THE SUBSTANTIALLY THAT HEAR 10 OUTWEIGHS HAS -- HAS -- EVEN POTENTIAL OF PREJUDICE JURY TO TO COUNSEL ALL JUST IF DESCRIBED MEAN IF FOR OF THIS ITS TO MINIMAL OBVIOUSLY TO ITS GOING COME FROM MR ELLISON BUT ITS GOING AS TO HAVE SOME IN IMPACT THE 11 EVIDENCE NOT HARM TO REPUTATION TO 12 MARKETPLACE WITHOUT WITHOUT -IF THEYRE THEY TO GOING BE ABLE BY TO HEAR THAT PRESENTATION 13 14 ARE PUT PERSUADED SOME THINK GIVEN VALUE YOUR OVERALL EVEN WANTING THAT IN VERY TO KIND ALLOW -IT 15 16 17 OF UNCONSCIOUS THAT WAS WAY ITS THAT IS VERY VERY THE DANGEROUS IT IN NOT PARTICULARLY -IT REASON WAS ALLOWED WAS DISALLOWED BECAUSE THERE WASNT ADEQUATE BEEN ADEQUATE 18 DISCLOSURE DISCOVERY AND THERE WASNT -- OBVIOUSLY HASNT 19 20 21 22 23 24 OF THIS AS ISSUE UNDERSTAND ON IT IT THE IT EXPERTS ARENT -- ARENT IN EVEN ANY GOING TO IS TESTIFY THAT BECAUSE 50 TO HASNT WONT BEEN HAVE EVALUATED ANY WAY CORRECT WHAT THE DO JURY DIRECTION WHATSOEVER ABOUT WITH THAT BUT THE PICKETT REPUTATION WAS THATS TRUE WHAT DAMAGE WAS TO THE 25 DISCLOSED WASNT DISCLOSED RAYNEE MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510 451-7530 52 UP-SELL/CROSS-SELL FOR YOUR OPPORTUNITIES SO IT -- AT LEAST THATS THE BASIS HONORS ORDER THE WAS DISCLOSED ABOUT COURT IT ILL BUT BUT THINK IT ITS IT NOT LIKELY GIVE HER IM GOING ORDER IT AS TO ALLOW IN ILL THINK ABOUT ILL ANOTHER READ MY UNDERSTANDING WAS TO AT THE TIME WAS THAT WOULD THE -- THAT MY INTENT PRECLUDE IT BE ALL EVIDENCE -- AS WELL DAMAGES ON IT BUT ILL IT GIVE MAY ANOTHER -IT MR OR RELEVANT 10 PICKETT OTHER AND MAY BE ADMISSIBLE FOR THE PURPOSES WHAT MAY BE -- COURT 11 SIMULTANEOUS COLLOQUY GAME OF WHACK-A-MOLE THAT SAP 12 MR MCDONELL THIS THE IS 13 14 MR ORACLE AND PICKETT FACT ONE TO INTENDED THINGS TO ATTACK ORACLE SAYS YEAH OF THE THEY ABOUT DID WHAT THEY THEY 15 SUCCEEDED WERE DOING THATS BACKGROUND WITH THE RESPECT TO THEIR KNOWLEDGE 16 17 PURCHASING TOMORROWNOW WHAT COURT NOW DONT UNDERSTAND SAYING -- YOURE -- WHAT 18 YOURE SAYING YOURE SAYING YOURE DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT 19 20 21 22 23 24 MR THE OTHER PURPOSES PICKETT PART WHEN OF -- LET SAY IT ME TRY BE AGAIN THEN ADMISSIBLE FOR COURT WHATS YOU MAY THE IT THAT ORACLE FELT ITS MR DAMAGED IN THE PICKETT REPUTATION WAS MARKETPLACE 25 THE COURT OKAY ALL RIGHT ILL BE VERY CLEAR IN RAYNEE MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510 451-7530 53 THE ORDER AS TO FOR ALL WHETHER -- ANY OR NOT IM GOING TO PERMIT THAT KIND OF TESTIMONY ANY PURPOSE TO THE RIGHT TURNING WE SECOND ONE -- WE TO NEED TO MOVE THINGS ALONG THAT CAUSE IS THE HAVE LOT OF THINGS GET THROUGH -- AND LOST PROFITS ON MR McDONELL LIMINE YES WE NO DEFENDANTS PROBLEM THAT WAS MOTION THE IN NO YOUR HONOR IS HAVE SIMILAR ORDER -- THE BACKGROUND CLEAR 10 AGAIN JUDGE LAPORTES CRYSTAL IN EXCLUDING AND EVIDENCE THOSE AS ANY ARE OF CROSS-SELL BASICALLY TO AND UP-SELL OF SOFTWARE OPPORTUNITIES LICENSES BECOME SALES 11 AS WELL SALES CUSTOMERS THAT HAD NEVER 12 CUSTOMERS THEY OF TOMORROWNOW APPEALED BE 13 14 THAT TO ORDER TO YOUR THAT HONOR EXCLUDED AND ASKED EVIDENCE BE THAT AS THEIR WAY AND WITNESSES ABLE WHY TALK ABOUT 15 16 17 OF EXPLAINING LOST PROFITS THEIR OTHER BE DAMAGES AND BE CLAIMS MAY THEY HIGH YOUR TO THE CLAIM MAY THEIR LOW ALSO ASKED TO HONOR ALL SPECIFICALLY IMPACTS THAT WITNESSES FROM ALLOWED TESTIFY 18 THE THEY PERCEIVED DEFENDANTS UNLAWFUL 19 20 21 22 23 24 ACTIVITIES AND OBJECTION TO WE CITE THERE TO THEIR APPLICATION TO YOU OR THEIR YOU AT ECF499 AND PAGE WE 16 OBJECTED SAID OUT UP NO THIS IS JUST KIND OF ROUNDABOUT ACTUALLY TO WAY BEEN OF GETTING EXCLUDED OUT TO VALUE PROP TALK OF THE EVIDENCE DAMAGES THATS CLAIMS OR YOUR OTHER 25 OUTRIGHT COME AND ABOUT EXACTLY WHATS BEEN RAYNEE MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510 451-7530 54 PRECLUDED AND YOUR HONORS ORDER WAS VERY DIRECTLY OR SO ONE WE CLEAR NO THAT THE WONT DOOR IN THE BE SO -- ALLOWED ISSUE IN THE -- EITHER OR INDIRECTLY UNTIL THROUGH RECENTLY JURY NOW BACK SOLVED -- THOUGHT IN AGAIN FOR EXAMPLE JURY THE DAMAGES THEY INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTION CUSTOMERS OR IN TO THEIR INSTRUCTIONS LOSSES TO HAVE AN SEEKING UNDER RECOVER FOR PROSPECTIVE THEIR INTERFERENCE CLAIM WOULD BECAME JUDGE BE WELL THAT 10 PROSPECTIVE CUSTOMERS AND BY THESE CUSTOMERS NEW ORDER TO HAD NOT BEEN ORACLE CUSTOMERS WHAT WAS -- WERE CUSTOMERS THAT THERE EXACTLY EXCLUDED LAPORTES SALES 11 WONT OTHER AND BE EVIDENCE THE 358 OR ARGUMENT THAT ARE AT OF LOST ISSUE THE THESE 12 COMPANIES THAN THEN USES HERE DOOR THEIR OPPORTUNITIES AS 13 14 MORE LOST SUBTLY THROUGH AND BACK DAMAGES FAIRLY WHERE LITTLE UP-SELL HE EXPERT CROSS-SELL UP-SELL 15 IMPORTANT BASICALLY -- THAT CENTERPIECE SAYS -- AND IS OF HIS THIS FAIR-VALUE-OF-USE US ANALYSIS 16 17 GETS BACK TO GOOD WILL AND BIT GOOD WILL SO LARGELY THESE TO CROSS-SELL LOSE THAT 18 OPPORTUNITIES ORACLE WAS GOING VALUE 19 TOO WE 20 21 22 23 24 AGAIN THINK THE THATS JUST THE BACK DOOR AND HAS THE EFFECT OF EVISCERATING WOULD SENSE OF JUDGE WITH LAPORTES ORDER SUBMIT THAT IS YOUR ABOUT VALUE VALUE HONOR LOST OF USE ORACLE PICKETT HONOR EXPERT IT IS THIS FAIR AT THE NOT PROFITS AND PAID YOUR OUR ABOUT THE MARKET TOTAL WHETHER FOR 25 CAN -- CAN LOOK RAYNEE MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510 451-7530 124 CERTIFICATE RAYNEE STATES THAT OF REPORTER OFFICIAL OF IN ET MERCADO DISTRICT REPORTER FOR THE UNITED COURT NORTHERN CALIFORNIA C07-01658 HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING ET PROCEEDINGS SAP PJH ORACLE BY CORPORATION CERTIFIED UNDER 10 AL AG AL WERE WERE REPORTED ME SHORTHAND DIRECTION AND OF REPORTER INTO TRUE AND THEREAFTER THE TRANSCRIBED IS MY TYPEWRITING RECORD OF THAT FOREGOING AS FULL ME AT COMPLETE THE TIME THE SAID PROCEEDINGS BOUND BY 11 FILING OF THE 12 VALIDITY BE REPORTERS CERTIFICATION AND/OR REMOVAL OF SAID THE 13 TRANSCRIPT COURT MAY VOID UPON DISASSEMBLY FROM 14 FILE 15 16 17 RAYNEE MERCADO MONDAY CSR RMR CRR 2010 FCRR CCRR 18 OCTOBER 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 RAYNEE MERCADO CSR RMR CRR FCRR CCRR 510 451-7530

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?