Eap v. United States of America et al

Filing 121

PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Illston on 12/17/08. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2008)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 It is hereby ORDERED pursuant to F.R.C.P. and the Local Rules of this Court: FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT: N/A at 2:30 p.m. Counsel must file a joint case management statement seven days in advance of the conference. DISCOVERY PLAN: Per F.R.Civ.P and Local Rules, subject to any provisions below. NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is March 31, 2009. DESIGNATION OF EXPERTS: 6/12/09; REBUTTAL: 6/30/09. Parties SHALL conform to Rule 26(a)(2). EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is July 17, 2009. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SHALL be filed by April 10, 2009; Opp. Due April 24, 2009; Reply Due May 1, 2009; and set for hearing no later than May 15, 2009 at 9:00 AM. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: August 25, 2009 at 3:30 PM. JURY TRIAL DATE: September 8, 2009 at 8:30 AM., Courtroom 10, 19th floor. TRIAL LENGTH is estimated to be days. v. USA, Defendant. / CHARLIE EAP, Plaintiff, No. C 07-02301 SI PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER SPECIAL DISCOVERY AND PRETRIAL PROVISIONS: Counsel have agreed to participate in private mediation on 5/13/09. Magistrate Zimmerman shall hear the any spoilation issues. Plaintiff shall file it's motion on 2/20/09, any opposition shall be filed 3/6/09, and any reply on 3/13/09. The pretrial conference SHALL be attended by trial counsel prepared to discuss all aspects of the case, including settlement. Parties SHALL conform to the attached instructions. Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve a copy of this order on any party subsequently joined in this action. Dated: SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?