Otsuka et al v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation et al

Filing 151

PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Illston on 4/28/09. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2009)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge It is hereby ORDERED pursuant to F.R.C.P. and the Local Rules of this Court: FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT: July 31, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. Counsel must file a joint case management statement seven days in advance of the conference. DISCOVERY PLAN: Per F.R.Civ.P and Local Rules, subject to any provisions below. NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is August 14, 2009. DESIGNATION OF EXPERTS: 8/24/09; REBUTTAL: 9/11/09. Parties SHALL conform to Rule 26(a)(2). EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is September 30, 2009. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SHALL be filed by October 30, 2009; Opp. Due November 13, 2009; Reply Due November 20, 2009; and set for hearing no later than December 4, 2009 at 9:00 AM. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: February 23, 2010 at 3:30 PM. JURY TRIAL DATE: March 8, 2010 at 8:30 AM., Courtroom 10, 19th floor. TRIAL LENGTH is estimated to be days. v. POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION, Defendant. / ANN OTSUKA, Plaintiff, No. C 07-02780 SI PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER SPECIAL DISCOVERY AND PRETRIAL PROVISIONS: The parties shall participate in private mediation in October 2009. Counsel shall inform the Court of the mediator selected by the end of May. The pretrial conference SHALL be attended by trial counsel prepared to discuss all aspects of the case, including settlement. Parties SHALL conform to the attached instructions. Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve a copy of this order on any party subsequently joined in this action.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?