Veterans for Common Sense et al v. Nicholson et al
Filing
199
Attachment 2
Opposition to Defendants' First 192 Motion in Limine filed by Veterans United for Truth, Inc, Veterans for Common Sense. Motion Hearing set for 4/21/2008 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco. (Attachments: #
1 Exhibit Attachment A, #
2 Proposed Order)(Erspamer, Gordon) (Filed on 4/17/2008) Modified on 4/18/2008 (aaa, Court Staff).
<![CDATA[
Veterans for Common Sense et al v. Nicholson et al
Doc. 199 Att. 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' FIRST MOTION IN LIMINE -- CASE NO. C-07-3758-SC sf-2501199
Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION VETERANS FOR COMMON SENSE, and VETERANS UNITED FOR TRUTH, INC., Plaintiffs, v. JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, et al., Defendants. Complaint Filed July 23, 2007 Case No. C-07-3758-SC
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' FIRST MOTION IN LIMINE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By:
Having considered Defendants' First Motion in Limine and Plaintiffs' Opposition thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendants' First Motion in Limine is denied. Hon. James P. Terry and Dr. Michael Kussman are ordered to appear for Plaintiffs' case in chief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April __, 2008 _____ THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI United States Senior District Judge Proposed Order Submitted by: SIDNEY M. WOLINSKY JENNIFER WEISER BEZOZA KATRINA KASEY CORBIT DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES GORDON P. ERSPAMER ARTURO J. GONZALEZ HEATHER A. MOSER STACEY M. SPRENKEL MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
/s/ Gordon P. Erspamer Gordon P. Erspamer Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' FIRST MOTION IN LIMINE-- CASE NO. C-07-3758-SC sf-2501199
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
