Wilkins v. Ahern
Filing
317
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 21, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/21/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
KEENAN WILKINS,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
No. C-08-1084 MMC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
v.
SHERIFF GREG AHERN, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
By order filed July 20, 2012, the Court denied plaintiff Keenan Wilkin’s application,
18
filed July 11, 2012, for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction. Now
19
before the Court is plaintiff’s request for reconsideration, filed August 6, 2012. Having read
20
and considered the request for reconsideration, the Court rules as follows.
21
In his request for reconsideration, plaintiff observes that he served defendants with
22
his July 11, 2012 application, and, in light of his providing proof of such service, seeks
23
reconsideration to the extent the denial was based on a lack of service. The Court’s July
24
20, 2012 denial, however, also was based on the alternative ground that the claims found
25
cognizable in the instant action pertain solely to events that allegedly occurred while
26
plaintiff was incarcerated at the Santa Rita County Jail, whereas the injunctive relief sought
27
by plaintiff’s July 11, 2012 application pertains solely to events that allegedly are occurring
28
at the Glen Dyer Detention Facility. As to that alternative ground, plaintiff has failed to
1
show, and cannot show, there exists any cognizable basis for reconsideration.
2
Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for reconsideration is hereby DENIED.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: August 21, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?