Polk v. Cavin et al
Filing
215
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 6, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/6/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
SUSAN MAE POLK,
No. C 08-1483 MMC (PR)
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
v.
13
DEPUTY JAMES CAVIN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
/
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Before the Court is plaintiff Susan Mae Polk’s “Request for Extension,” filed October
17, 2012. Defendants have filed a response. Having and considered the parties’
respective written submissions, the Court rules as follows.
Plaintiff seeks an extension of “all deadlines” to January 3, 2013, because,
according to plaintiff, she was transferred to a state prison in Corona, California on October
9, 2012 and had not received her legal documents as of October 13, 2012, i.e., four days
later. The only pending deadline is the December 6, 2012 deadline for plaintiff to file
opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Because plaintiff was served by
mail with defendants’ motion for summary judgment on December 21, 2011, plaintiff, under
the present schedule and as a result of numerous extensions she has been afforded, will
have close to one year to prepare her opposition. Plaintiff has failed to show that, as a
result of her recent transfer or otherwise, she cannot in the exercise of reasonable
1
diligence complete her opposition by December 6, 2012.
2
Accordingly, plaintiff’s request is hereby DENIED.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: November 6, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?