Polk v. Cavin et al

Filing 215

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 6, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/6/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 SUSAN MAE POLK, No. C 08-1483 MMC (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME v. 13 DEPUTY JAMES CAVIN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 / 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is plaintiff Susan Mae Polk’s “Request for Extension,” filed October 17, 2012. Defendants have filed a response. Having and considered the parties’ respective written submissions, the Court rules as follows. Plaintiff seeks an extension of “all deadlines” to January 3, 2013, because, according to plaintiff, she was transferred to a state prison in Corona, California on October 9, 2012 and had not received her legal documents as of October 13, 2012, i.e., four days later. The only pending deadline is the December 6, 2012 deadline for plaintiff to file opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Because plaintiff was served by mail with defendants’ motion for summary judgment on December 21, 2011, plaintiff, under the present schedule and as a result of numerous extensions she has been afforded, will have close to one year to prepare her opposition. Plaintiff has failed to show that, as a result of her recent transfer or otherwise, she cannot in the exercise of reasonable 1 diligence complete her opposition by December 6, 2012. 2 Accordingly, plaintiff’s request is hereby DENIED. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: November 6, 2012 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?