Polk v. Cavin et al

Filing 240

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER OF NOVEMBER 27, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 28, 2013. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/28/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
DEPUTY JAMES CAVIN, et al.,
)
)
)
Defendants.
_______________________________ )
SUSAN MAE POLK,

No. C 08-1483 MMC (PR)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S ORDER OF
NOVEMBER 27, 2012

16

Before the Court are plaintiff’s “Objections to Magistrate’s 11-27-12 Order Denying

17

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel CCCSO to Comply with Discovery.” By said filing, plaintiff

18

objects to the order issued November 27, 2012 by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero, in

19

which order the Magistrate Judge denied plaintiff’s motion to compel the Contra Costa

20

County Sheriff’s Office to produce five categories of documents.

21

Having read and considered the above-referenced objections, the Court hereby

22

DENIES the objections, for the reason plaintiff has failed to show the Magistrate Judge’s

23

denial of the above-referenced motion to compel is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See

24

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) (providing district court may reconsider magistrate’s order where it

25

has been shown to be “clearly erroneous or contrary to law”).

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 28, 2013
_________________________
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge