Polk v. Cavin et al

Filing 242

ORDER GRANTING 241 EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE SHERIFF LIVINGSTON. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 31, 2013.(mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/31/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JAMES CAVIN, et al., ) ) Defendants. _______________________________ ) SUSAN MAE POLK, 13 No. C 08-1483 MMC (PR) ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE SHERIFF LIVINGSTON (Docket No. 241) Before the Court is plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file a reply brief in 14 support of plaintiff’s motion to substitute Contra Costa County Sheriff Livingston for former 15 Sheriff Rupf as a defendant in this action, which motion was filed December 26, 2012. 16 Pursuant to the Court’s scheduling order of January 4, 2013, defendants filed an opposition 17 on January 18, 2013, and plaintiff’s reply is currently due on or before February 1, 2013. 18 Plaintiff seeks an additional thirty-six days. 19 In light of plaintiff’s statement that prison officials have denied plaintiff access to her 20 legal materials and to the law library, the Court finds good cause has been shown for an 21 extension, but, given the relatively straightforward nature of the motion, that an extension of 22 thirty-six days is not necessary. 23 Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for an extension is hereby GRANTED in part, and the 24 Court hereby extends to February 15, 2013 the deadline for plaintiff to file and serve her 25 reply. 26 This order terminates Docket No. 241. 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 DATED: January 31, 2013 _________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?