Polk v. Cavin et al
Filing
242
ORDER GRANTING 241 EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE SHERIFF LIVINGSTON. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 31, 2013.(mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/31/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
JAMES CAVIN, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
_______________________________ )
SUSAN MAE POLK,
13
No. C 08-1483 MMC (PR)
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE
REPLY RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO SUBSTITUTE SHERIFF
LIVINGSTON
(Docket No. 241)
Before the Court is plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file a reply brief in
14
support of plaintiff’s motion to substitute Contra Costa County Sheriff Livingston for former
15
Sheriff Rupf as a defendant in this action, which motion was filed December 26, 2012.
16
Pursuant to the Court’s scheduling order of January 4, 2013, defendants filed an opposition
17
on January 18, 2013, and plaintiff’s reply is currently due on or before February 1, 2013.
18
Plaintiff seeks an additional thirty-six days.
19
In light of plaintiff’s statement that prison officials have denied plaintiff access to her
20
legal materials and to the law library, the Court finds good cause has been shown for an
21
extension, but, given the relatively straightforward nature of the motion, that an extension of
22
thirty-six days is not necessary.
23
Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for an extension is hereby GRANTED in part, and the
24
Court hereby extends to February 15, 2013 the deadline for plaintiff to file and serve her
25
reply.
26
This order terminates Docket No. 241.
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
28
DATED: January 31, 2013
_________________________
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?