Whitsitt v. Zedlitz et al

Filing 76

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS; VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CLERK; AND DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO RE-SERVE MOTION TO DISMISS. Motion Hearing set for 4/20/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/21/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/21/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (jjoS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 No. C 08-01803 JSW Plaintiff, v. JEAN ZEDLITZ, et al. Defendants. / ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS, VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK; AND DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO RE-SERVE MOTION TO DISMISS 14 15 On November 2, 2011, the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion in which it affirmed, in part, 16 and reversed, in part, this Court’s Order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss. In that Order, 17 the Court also dismissed a due process claim that Plaintiff asserted against R. Lance & Son. On 18 December 16, 2011, this Court issued an Order directing that service be effected upon R. Lance 19 & Son. The Court served that Order on Plaintiff. However, the docket reflects that it was 20 returned as undeliverable, apparently because Plaintiff has moved and the time for forwarding 21 his mail has expired. (See Docket No. 69.) 22 Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 3-11(a), when a party’s address changes 23 during the course of litigation, it is that party’s duty to “promptly file with the Court and serve 24 upon all opposing parties a Notice of Change of Address specifying the new address.” In 25 addition, “[t]he Court may, without prejudice, dismiss a complaint or strike an answer when: (1) 26 Mail directed to [that party] by the Court has been returned to the Court as not deliverable; and 27 (2) The Court fails to receive within 60 days of this return a written communication from the 28 [party] indicating a current address.” N.D. Civ. L.R. 3-11(b). 1 Plaintiff has not submitted a change of address to this Court, and more than sixty days 2 have passed since the Order Directing Service was returned. Although the Court could, within 3 its discretion, dismiss this matter without prejudice, the Court was able to locate a different 4 address for Plaintiff in materials that he filed during his appeal. Accordingly, the Clerk shall 5 serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff at the address currently listed on the docket as well as 6 this new address. If Plaintiff does receive this Order, he is ORDERED to file a Notice of 7 Change of Address with the Court and to serve that notice on all opposing parties. If this Order 8 is returned as undeliverable to both addresses, and if the Court does not receive a Notice of 9 Change of Address within sixty days of any returned mail, the Court shall dismiss this matter 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 without prejudice. On January 26, 2012, R. Lance & Sons. Co. filed a motion to dismiss, which is 12 scheduled for a hearing on March 2, 2012. Under the Northern District Civil Local Rules, 13 Plaintiff’s opposition to that motion would have been due on February 13, 2012. See N.D. Civ. 14 L.R. 7-3(a), 5-5(a). Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion. However, R. Lance & 15 Sons served Plaintiff at his old address. Thus, it is not clear that Plaintiff has received a copy of 16 the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS Defendant to re-serve 17 Plaintiff with the motion to dismiss, at both his old and presumably new address as set forth on 18 the Certificate of Service to this Order, by no later than February 28, 2012, and to file proof of 19 such service with the Court. 20 The Court HEREBY CONTINUES the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss from March 2, 21 2012 to April 20, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., and it VACATES the case management conference 22 scheduled for March 23, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. Pursuant to this Order, Plaintiff shall file his 23 opposition to the motion to dismiss by no later than March 16, 2012, and Defendant’s reply 24 shall be due by no later than March 30, 2012. If the Court finds the matter suitable for 25 disposition without oral argument, it shall notify the parties in advance of the hearing date. 26 Finally, the Court HEREBY ADVISES Plaintiff that the Handbook for Pro Se Litigants, 27 which contains helpful information about proceeding without an attorney, is available through 28 the Court’s website or in the Clerk’s office. The Court also advises Plaintiff that he also may 2 1 wish to seek assistance from the Legal Help Center. Plaintiff may call the Legal Help Center at 2 415-782-9000, extension 8657, or sign up on the 15th Floor of the Courthouse, Room 2796, for 3 a free appointment with an attorney who may be able to provide basic legal help, but not legal 4 representation. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: February 21, 2012 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 WILLIAM J. WHITSITT et al, Case Number: CV08-01803 JSW 6 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 v. 8 JEAN ZEDLITZ et al, 9 Defendant. / 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. 12 District Court, Northern District of California. 13 That on February 21, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter 14 listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 15 16 William J. Whitsitt 17 1763 Ray Wise Lane Tracy, CA 95376 18 Dated: February 21, 2012 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?