Whitsitt v. Zedlitz et al
Filing
76
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS; VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CLERK; AND DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO RE-SERVE MOTION TO DISMISS. Motion Hearing set for 4/20/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/21/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/21/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (jjoS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
No. C 08-01803 JSW
Plaintiff,
v.
JEAN ZEDLITZ, et al.
Defendants.
/
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING
ON MOTION TO DISMISS,
VACATING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK;
AND DIRECTING DEFENDANT
TO RE-SERVE MOTION TO
DISMISS
14
15
On November 2, 2011, the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion in which it affirmed, in part,
16
and reversed, in part, this Court’s Order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss. In that Order,
17
the Court also dismissed a due process claim that Plaintiff asserted against R. Lance & Son. On
18
December 16, 2011, this Court issued an Order directing that service be effected upon R. Lance
19
& Son. The Court served that Order on Plaintiff. However, the docket reflects that it was
20
returned as undeliverable, apparently because Plaintiff has moved and the time for forwarding
21
his mail has expired. (See Docket No. 69.)
22
Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 3-11(a), when a party’s address changes
23
during the course of litigation, it is that party’s duty to “promptly file with the Court and serve
24
upon all opposing parties a Notice of Change of Address specifying the new address.” In
25
addition, “[t]he Court may, without prejudice, dismiss a complaint or strike an answer when: (1)
26
Mail directed to [that party] by the Court has been returned to the Court as not deliverable; and
27
(2) The Court fails to receive within 60 days of this return a written communication from the
28
[party] indicating a current address.” N.D. Civ. L.R. 3-11(b).
1
Plaintiff has not submitted a change of address to this Court, and more than sixty days
2
have passed since the Order Directing Service was returned. Although the Court could, within
3
its discretion, dismiss this matter without prejudice, the Court was able to locate a different
4
address for Plaintiff in materials that he filed during his appeal. Accordingly, the Clerk shall
5
serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff at the address currently listed on the docket as well as
6
this new address. If Plaintiff does receive this Order, he is ORDERED to file a Notice of
7
Change of Address with the Court and to serve that notice on all opposing parties. If this Order
8
is returned as undeliverable to both addresses, and if the Court does not receive a Notice of
9
Change of Address within sixty days of any returned mail, the Court shall dismiss this matter
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
without prejudice.
On January 26, 2012, R. Lance & Sons. Co. filed a motion to dismiss, which is
12
scheduled for a hearing on March 2, 2012. Under the Northern District Civil Local Rules,
13
Plaintiff’s opposition to that motion would have been due on February 13, 2012. See N.D. Civ.
14
L.R. 7-3(a), 5-5(a). Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion. However, R. Lance &
15
Sons served Plaintiff at his old address. Thus, it is not clear that Plaintiff has received a copy of
16
the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS Defendant to re-serve
17
Plaintiff with the motion to dismiss, at both his old and presumably new address as set forth on
18
the Certificate of Service to this Order, by no later than February 28, 2012, and to file proof of
19
such service with the Court.
20
The Court HEREBY CONTINUES the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss from March 2,
21
2012 to April 20, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., and it VACATES the case management conference
22
scheduled for March 23, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. Pursuant to this Order, Plaintiff shall file his
23
opposition to the motion to dismiss by no later than March 16, 2012, and Defendant’s reply
24
shall be due by no later than March 30, 2012. If the Court finds the matter suitable for
25
disposition without oral argument, it shall notify the parties in advance of the hearing date.
26
Finally, the Court HEREBY ADVISES Plaintiff that the Handbook for Pro Se Litigants,
27
which contains helpful information about proceeding without an attorney, is available through
28
the Court’s website or in the Clerk’s office. The Court also advises Plaintiff that he also may
2
1
wish to seek assistance from the Legal Help Center. Plaintiff may call the Legal Help Center at
2
415-782-9000, extension 8657, or sign up on the 15th Floor of the Courthouse, Room 2796, for
3
a free appointment with an attorney who may be able to provide basic legal help, but not legal
4
representation.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: February 21, 2012
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT et al,
Case Number: CV08-01803 JSW
6
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
7
v.
8
JEAN ZEDLITZ et al,
9
Defendant.
/
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
12 District Court, Northern District of California.
13 That on February 21, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter
14 listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an
inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
15
16
William J. Whitsitt
17 1763 Ray Wise Lane
Tracy, CA 95376
18
Dated: February 21, 2012
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?