Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation
Filing
118
MOTION for Leave to File APPLE INC.'S REPLY TO PSYSTAR CORPORATION'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON THE RELEVANCE OF TOPIC 3 TESTIMONY, DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 to Miscellaneous Administrative Request, # 2 Proposed Order Granting Administrative Request, # 3 Affidavit Decl. of Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith In Support of Miscellaneous Administrative Request, # 4 Exhibit 1 to Decl. of Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith In Support of Administrative Request, # 5 Exhibit 2 to Decl. of Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith In Support of Administrative Request, # 6 Exhibit 3 to Decl. of Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith In Support of Administrative Request, # 7 Exhibit 4 to Decl. of Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith In Support of Administrative Request, # 8 Exhibit 5 to Decl. of Mehrnaz Boroumand Smith In Support of Administrative Request)(Gilliland, James) (Filed on 9/2/2009)
Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation
Doc. 118 Att. 1
Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document118-2
Filed09/02/09 Page1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP JAMES G. GILLILAND, JR. (State Bar No. 107988) MEHRNAZ BOROUMAND SMITH (State Bar No. 197271) MEGAN M. CHUNG (State Bar No. 232044) J. JEB B. OBLAK (State Bar No. 241384) Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 576-0200 Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 Email: jggilliland@townsend.com mboroumand@townsend.com mmchung@townsend.com jboblak@townsend.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant APPLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. PSYSTAR CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
Case No. CV 08-03251 WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING APPLE TO FILE APPLE INC.'S REPLY TO PSYSTAR CORPORATION'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON THE RELEVANCE OF TOPIC 3 TESTIMONY, DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
For good cause shown, Apple Inc.'s Miscellaneous Administrative Request For An Order Permitting Apple To File A Reply To Psystar Corporation's Supplemental Briefing on the Relevance of Topic 3 Testimony, Defendant's Motion to Compel and Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for a Protective Order is GRANTED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MISC. ADMIN. REQUEST FOR ORDER PERMITTING APPLE TO FILE REPLY TO PSYSTAR'S SUPPL. BRIEF ON RELEVANCE OF TOPIC 3 TESTIMONY, ETC. CASE NO. CV 08-03251 WHA
1
Dockets.Justia.com
Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document118-2
Filed09/02/09 Page2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
62198013 v1
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Hon. William Alsup United States District Judge
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MISC. ADMIN. REQUEST FOR ORDER PERMITTING APPLE TO FILE REPLY TO PSYSTAR'S SUPPL. BRIEF ON RELEVANCE OF TOPIC 3 TESTIMONY, ETC. CASE NO. CV 08-03251 WHA
2
Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document118-2
Filed09/02/09 Page3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Esther Casillas, declare I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, California in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction this service was made. I am over the age of eighteen and not a party to this action. My business address is Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP, Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor, San Francisco, California, 94111. I served the following document exactly entitled: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING APPLE TO FILE APPLE INC.'S REPLY TO PSYSTAR CORPORATION'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON THE RELEVANCE OF TOPIC 3 TESTIMONY, DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, on the interested parties in this action following the ordinary business practice of Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP, as follows: K.A.D. Camara Camara & Sibley LLP 2339 University Boulevard Houston, TX 77005 Phone: 713-893-7973 Fax: 713-583-1131 David Vernon Welker Welker & Rosario 2230 Skillern Drive Boise, Idaho 83709 Phone: 949-378-2900 Fax: 717-924-6627 email: camara@camarasibley.com
email: david.welker@werolaw.com
[By First Class Mail] I am readily familiar with my employer's practice for collecting and processing documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service. On the date listed herein, following ordinary business practice, I served the within document(s) at my place of business, by placing a true copy thereof, enclosed in a sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid, for collection and mailing with the United States Postal Service where it would be deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. [By Overnight Courier] I caused each envelope to be delivered by a commercial carrier service for overnight delivery to the offices of the addressee(s). [By Hand] I directed each envelope to the party(ies) so designated on the service list to be delivered by courier this date. [By Facsimile Transmission] I caused said document to be sent by facsimile transmission to the fax number indicated for the party(ies) listed above. [By Electronic Transmission] I caused said document to be sent by electronic transmission to the e-mail address indicated for the party(ies) listed above via the court's ECF notification system. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on September 2, 2009, at San Francisco, California. /s/ Esther Casillas 1
Esther Casillas
PSYSTAR'S SUPPL. BRIEF ON RELEVANCE OF TOPIC 3 TESTIMONY, ETC. CASE NO. CV 08-03251 WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MISC. ADMIN. REQUEST FOR ORDER PERMITTING APPLE TO FILE REPLY TO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?