Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation
Reply Memorandum 127 APPLE INC.'S REPLY TO PSYSTAR CORPORATION'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON THE RELEVANCE OF TOPIC 3 TESTIMONY, DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL, AND PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Gilliland, James) (Filed on 9/3/2009) Modified on 9/4/2009 (sis, COURT STAFF).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 APPLE, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. PSYSTAR CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Defendant. / AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. / AMENDED ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S LETTER OF 8/31/2009 RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE No. C 08-03251 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The status conference set for SEPTEMBER 4, 2009, is moved up to 10:00 a.m. The Court shall hear defendant's discovery dispute following the status conference. Plaintiff's response is due by 9:00 a.m. on September 4, 2009. An evidentiary hearing in another matter that had been set for 9:00 a.m. has now been vacated. This will allow the Court more time to hear the parties' discovery dispute. The parties need to further meet-and-confer in the Court's jury room at 9:00 a.m. that same day. Only those counsel who participate in the meet-and-confer in the jury room may argue at the discovery hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 3, 2009.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?