Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation

Filing 125

Memorandum in Opposition to Psystar's Letter Brief filed August 31, 2009 112 filed by Apple Inc. REDACTED VERSION. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5)(Chung, Megan) (Filed on 9/3/2009) Modified on 9/4/2009 (sis, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation Doc. 125 Att. 4 Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document125-5 Filed09/03/09 Page1 of 6 EXHIBIT 4 TO DECLARATION OF MEGAN CHUNG IN SUPPORT OF APPLE INC.'S OPPOSITION TO PSYSTAR'S BRIEF FILED AUGUST 31, 2009 Dockets.Justia.com Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document125-5 Filed09/03/09 Page2 of 6 1. {; {) 7 B 9 A LLmll~" t01 1 ) ndau 'e IJm~ 1 .iLt a 1 · , "y'TAR UJRl'UR{ HUN r '10 1 L1NJ'~ t l J T R[\lLA 12 13 1-4 15 .,-i,. . pr .F. FR:, TTSC D]V~SI TN ".· II: ul i ", ~m i ~';.1T[l( "Uti (1n. c '. :-..10. CV 1J~·UJ25 WA PLuiTI t -n: 16 1 18 P~ ...... ~TAR CO 0" n "\l Dt'l~nduTl L 19- f t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ; 20 V HJ::LA 1 D CO _ "1 E l C L l ' . l : 21 22 23 2 25 26 2' 28 Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document125-5 Filed09/03/09 Page3 of 6 1 2 3 NOTICI': Please take notice that pursuant 10 Rule 30(b)(6) a f t h e Rules o f Federal Procedure and in accordance \\ ilh Judge Alsup's Supplemental O r d e r ( D o c k e t 0 . 8 ) . Psystar Corporation 4 (··Psystar") will take the deposition upon oral e x a m i n a t i o n o f the representative o f Apple Inc. ( " A p p l e " ) \\ h o h a s k n O \ \ ledge o f a n d may leSlif) concerning the matters set forth below. The 5 6 7 deposition \ \ i l l take place o n August 1 3 , 2 0 0 9 at 3 7 9 L y n o n Ave .. Palo Alto, CA 94301 and \\ill be r e c o r d e d b y s t e n o g r a p h y a n d / o r video. T h e d e p o s i t i o n s h a l l take p l a c e b e f o r e a n o t a r y p u b l i c o r other officer authorized to administer oaths and shall continue from d a y to day until completed, 8 9 Apple is requested and required to designate and make available to lestify a person or persons knowledgeable about the following topics (in the following list o f topics. the t e n n " O S X " 10 includes both Mac as x and Mac 11 12 I. as x Server): Actual o r p o t e n t i a l c o n f u s i o n b e t \ \ c c n A p p l e ' s p r o d u c t s a n d P s y s t a r ' s p r o d u c t s . i n c l u d i n g 10 but not limited a n y a n d a l l c o m m u n i c a t i o n s b e t w e e n A p p l e a n d a n y third p e r s o n a b o u t P s y s t a r ' s 13 products. 14 The usc. d c \ e l o p m e n t . registration, and i m c s t m e n t in each o f t h c t r a d c m a r k s o r items o r (0: 15 2. 1 6 tradc dress at issue in this action. including but nOllimited 17 :l. the identity o f c a c h mark o r item o f trade dress at issue; the fUllctionality or lack t h e r e o f o f each item o f trade dress; the length o f Lise o f each mark at issue; lhe amount o f money spent to d e v e l o p each mark at issue; the time and m a n n e r o f registration o f e a c h registered mark: an} p r i o r litigation involving the marks o r items o f trade d r e s s at issue: the sales and profit associated with each o f the marks o r i t e m s o f trade d r e s s at issue: the m a n n e r in which e a c h mark o r item o f trade dress was used. including the geographic scope o f such use and the n w n b e r and cost o f any advertisements using the mark o r item o f trade dress: 18 19 b. c. d. 20 21 22 e. f. 23 g. h. 24 25 26 I. t h e s i m i l a r i t i e s a n d difTerences b e t w e e n e a c h m a r k o r i t e m o f t r a d e d r e s s a n d t h e i r allegedly infringing Psystar counterparts; 27 28 -2PSYSTAR CORP.·S NOTICE OF RULE 30(13)(6) DEPOSITION Case No. CV -08-03251- WHA Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document125-5 Filed09/03/09 Page4 of 6 1 J. the similarities and differences between each product to which each mark o r item o f trade dress is applied and the Psystar counterpart with respect t o which Psysrar is alleged to have infringed the mark or item o f trade dress; 2 3 4 k. the use o f each mark o r item o f trade dress o r any similar mark o r item o f trade dress by others. whether o r not under license, and, i f under license, the lemlS o f each such 5 6 I. license: a n d the p u b l i c ' s awareness o f and lhe associations brought to mind by each mark o r item o f trade dress, to the extent information about Ihis topic is actually known by o r is reasonably available to Apple. 7 8 9 1 0 3. The injury suffered by Apple as a result o r t h e allegedly unlawful acts a b o u t which Apple complains in this action and the injury that Apple is likely t o suffer i f these acts continue. including 11 12 but not limited to the amount and marulcr o f calculation o f any lost profits, and distinguishing between the injury caused by each unlawful act in which Apple alleges that Psystar engaged. 13 14 4. The amount o f a reasonable royalty for the use o f OS X in the manner in which Psystar is 1 5 alleged to be using it or. i f no such royally is known, the maimer in which such a royalty might be 16 17 calculated. 5. T h e manner in which OS X is distributed through retailers like Amazon and Best Buy. 18 including the existence and terms o f any agreements between Apple and such retailers relaling to 1 9 their retailing o f OS X. and the m a n n e r in which OS X is available from Apple, both online and 20 21 through its physical Apple Stores. Further, the manner in which otherwise madeavailabJc to members o r t h e public. as x is sold, licensed, or 22 23 6. D e m o g r a p h i c d a t a a b o u t A p p l e " s c u s t o m e r s a n d t h e i r e x p e r i e n c e s with c o m p u t e r s . b o t h those manufactured by Apple and those not manufactured by Apple, to the extent such infonnation 24 is actually known by or is reasonably available to Apple. 25 26 27 28 7. T h e q u a l i t y . o p e r a t i o n , and features o f P s y s t a r ' s p r o d u c t s and r e p o r t s r e g a r d i n g o r investigations o f the quality, operation, and features o f P s y s t a r ' s products, whether performed by Apple internally o r received by Apple from third parties. P S Y S T A R C O R P : S N O T I C E O F RULE 3 0 ( B ) ( 6 ) D E P O S I T I O N Case No. CV-08-03251-WHA Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document125-5 Filed09/03/09 Page5 of 6 1 2 8. 3 and T h e c o s t s t r u c t u r e for d e v e l o p m e n t , p r o d u c t i o n . m a r k e t i n g . a n d s a l e o f A p p l e ' s c o m p u t e r s as X. including the costs, revenue, and profits for each such product, broken down. to the 4 e x t e n t p o s s i b l e , b e t w c e n t h e h a r d w a r e , t h e o p e r a t i n g s y s t e m , a n d o t h e r i n s t a l l e d s o f t w a r e , a n d the m a n n e r in which this information is or can b e c a l c u l a t e d . 5 69 7 8 9 T h e m a n n e r o f formation a n d t e r m s o f a n y license a g r e e m e n t o r o t h e r a g r e e m e n t relating to as x that Apple contends exists betwccn itself and users o f as X, including but not limited to P s y s t a r a n d P s y s t a r ' s c u s t o m e r s , a n d e a c h b r e a c h o f a n y s u c h a g r e e m e n t o v e r w h i c h A p p l e is s u i n g in this litigation o r lhat A p p l e c o n t e n d s will o r m i g h t b e e n g a g e d in by P s y s t a r · s c u s t o m c r s . 10 10. T h e c o d e a n d m a n n e r o f o p e r a t i o n o f D a r w i n , bOlh i n d e p e n d e n t l y a n d as i n c o r p o r a l e d i n t o 11 12 13 14 as X. i n d u d i n g . in parlicular. the role o f kcrnel extensions and the extensibility. including through kernel e x t e n s i o n s . o f Darwin a n d as X. Further, the m a n n e r in which Darwin c a m e to b e released to the p u b l i c as o p e n s o u r c e a n d the terms o f the l i c e n s e u n d e r w h i c h D a r w i n \\'as so released to the public. Further. the m a n n e r in which D a r w i n o r parts o f D a r w i n a r e i n c o r p o r a t e d into as x. 15 16 17 11. L i c e n s e a g r e e m e n t s with third p e r s o n s t o u s e a n y o f t h e t r a d e m a r k s o r i t e m s o f t r a d e d r e s s o r c o p y r i g h t e d works_ i n c l u d i n g but not limited to as x, al issue in this action, including the n e g o t i a t i o n , f o r m a t i o n , and t e r m s o f t h e s e a g r e e m e n t s . 18 19 20 21 12. All a t t e m p l s by A p p l e ( o r by third parties, i f a c t u a l l y k n o w n by A p p l e o r r e a s o n a b l y available to A p p l e ) to c a u s e a s x to run o n n o n - A p p l e h a r d w a r e , w h a t t h e s e a t t e m p t s c o n s i s t e d of, a n d w h a t the r e s u l t s o f t h e s e a t t e m p t s w e r e . 22 23 24 13. The rnarkeL d e m a n d and a n y e v i d e n c e o f the e x i s t e n c e o r m a g n i t u d e o f such d e m a n d for OS X s e p a r a t e l y from h a r d w a r e a n d f o r as x installed o n non-Apple hardware. as x Jor 25 14. 26 A n y n c g o t i a t i o n s b e t w e e n A p p l e a n d a n y third p a r t i e s r e g a r d i n g l i c e n s i n g installation on non-Apple hardware. 27 28 -4PSYSTAR C O R P : S NOTICE OF RULE 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION C a s e N o . C V - 0 8 - 0 3 2 5 1 - WHA Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document125-5 Filed09/03/09 Page6 of 6 1 15. 2 T h e a u t h o r s h i p , d e v e l o p m e n t . i d e n t i t y , a n d r e g i s t r a t i o n o f e a c h c o p y r i g h t e d w o r k a l i s u e in 11, till litigati including any d e r i v a t i v e w o r k s o r c o m p i l a t i o n tl1a1 A p p l e c o n t e n d s P s y s t a r 3 infringed. 4 16. T h e s p e c i f i c acts o f c o p y r i g h t i n f r i n g e m e n t in w h i c h A p p l e c o n t e n d s P s y s t a r e n g a g e d , t h e e a c t s o n s t i t u t e d c o p y r i g h t i n f r i n g e m e n t a n d the identity a n d n a t u r e o f t h e 5 m a n n e r in which th 6 specific copyrighted w o r k s t h a t A p p l e c o n t Dds P s y t a r infTinged. 7 8 17. he i d e n t i t y a n d n a t u r e o f e a c h t e c h n o l o g i c a l m c a s m e t h a t A p p l e c o n t e n d s t h a t P s y s t a r 9 u n l a w f u l l y c i r c u m v e n t e d , e a c h a c t t h a t A p p l e c o n t e n d s c o n s t i t u t e d s u c h c i r c w T l v e n t i o n , the m a n n e r 10 in which P s y t a r c i r c u m v e n t e d the t e c h n o l o g i c a l m e a s u r e , the m a n n e r in w h i c h o t h e r s c o u l d have circLUllvemed the teclmological m e a ure, and 'ti1e identity a n d n a t u r e o f t h e c o p y r i g h t e d work t h a t 11 the t e c h n o l o g i c a l m e a ure i n q u e s t i o n was protecting. 12 13 18. Q u a l i t y c o n t r o l . p r f o n n a n c e , a n d u s e r e x p e r i n e e w i t h i n t e g r a t e d h a r d w a r e a n d o f t are; 14 and c o m p a t i b i l i t y i s u e s with tllird party c o m p o n e n t s a n d a p p l i c a t i o n . CAMARA & SIBLEY LLP By:,c::-,;---,------::;::---:=:-:-;;--;;--c-=--,---------------- c:=-----=:--K.A.D. C A M A R A WELKER & Ro ARlO Attorneys for DefendantiCounterclaimant PSYSTAR CORPORATIO -5P Y S T A R C O R P . ' S O T I C E OF R U L E 3 0 ( B ) ( 6 ) D E P O S I T I O N C a s e o. C V - 0 8 - 0 3 2 -1- W H A

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?