Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation

Filing 45

STIPULATION Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Complete Mediation and [Proposed] Order Amending the Case Management Order to Reflect the Same by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Boroumand Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 12/30/2008)

Download PDF
Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation Doc. 45 Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document45 Filed12/30/08 Page1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP JAMES G. GILLILAND, JR. (State Bar No. 107988) MEHRNAZ BOROUMAND SMITH (State Bar No. 197271) MEGAN M. CHUNG (State Bar No. 232044) J. JEB B. OBLAK (State Bar No. 241384) Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 576-0200 Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 Email: jggilliland@townsend.com; mboroumand@townsend.com; mmchung@townsend.com; jboblak@townsend.com Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE INC. ROBERT J. YORIO (State Bar No. 93178) COLBY B. SPRINGER (State Bar No. 214868) CHRISTOPHER P. GREWE (State Bar No. 245938) CARR & FERRELL LLP 2200 Geng Road Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 812-3400 Facsimile: (650) 812-3444 Email: ryorio@carrferrell.com; cspringer@carrferrell.com cgrewe@carrferrell.com Attorneys for Defendant PSYSTAR CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION APPLE INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. PSYSTAR CORPORATION, Defendant. Case No. CV 08-3251 WHA STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING THE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER TO REFLECT THE SAME Judge: Courtroom: Honorable William Alsup 9, 19th Floor STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING THE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER TO REFLECT THE SAME Case No. CV 08-03251 WHA Dockets.Justia.com Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document45 Filed12/30/08 Page2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS on November 7, 2008, this Court issued a Case Management Order setting January 31, 2009 as the last day for the parties to complete JAMS mediation; WHEREAS Plaintiff Apple Inc. ("Apple") and Defendant Psystar Corp. ("Psystar") met and conferred on the selection of a Mediator and agreed to have the mediation before Hon. Daniel Weinstein (Ret.); WHEREAS the only enlargements of time pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-2(a)(2) enlarged the time Psystar was allowed to respond to the complaint (two separate enlargements), enlarged the time Apple was allowed to respond to Psystar's Counterclaims and moved the date of the hearing on Psystar's motion for leave to amend its counterclaims by one week (Declaration of J. Jeb B. Oblak in Support of The Parties' Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Complete Mediation (Attached Hereto as Exhibit A) at 3-4); WHEREAS Apple and Psystar attempted to schedule a mediation in late January before Judge Weinstein but learned that he was not available during those times in January when the parties were available (Id. at 5); WHEREAS the next available date on Judge Weinstein's Calendar on which all the parties and their counsel are available for mediation is February 18, 2009 (Id. at 6); WHEREAS the rescheduling of the mediation to February 18, 2009 shall in no way interfere with the progress of discovery or other aspects of the litigation and shall not impact any of the other dates set forth in this Court's Case Management Order (Id. at 7); THEREFORE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(d), both parties stipulate to an extension of the deadline to complete mediation from January 31, 2008 to February 18, 2009. The parties also respectfully request that the Court amend its Case Management Order changing the date by which mediation must be completed from January 31, 2009 to February 18, 2009. STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING THE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER TO REFLECT THE SAME Case No. CV 08-03251 WHA 1 Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document45 Filed12/30/08 Page3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: December 30, 2008 Respectfully submitted, TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP By: /s/ James G. Gilliland, Jr. JAMES G. GILLILAND, JR. Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE INC. DATED: December 30, 2008 CARR & FERRELL LLP By: /s/ Colby B. Springer COLBY B. SPRINGER Attorneys for Defendant PSYSTAR CORPORATION STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING THE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER TO REFLECT THE SAME Case No. CV 08-03251 WHA 2 Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document45 Filed12/30/08 Page4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation, this Court GRANTS the parties' request and AMENDS the deadline to complete mediation as set forth in the November 7, 2008 Case Management Order from January 31, 2009 to February 18, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Hon. William Alsup United States District Court Judge STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING THE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER TO REFLECT THE SAME Case No. CV 08-03251 WHA 3 Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document45 Filed12/30/08 Page5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 61740699 v1 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection upon request. Dated: December 30, 2008 /s/ James G. Gilliland, Jr. JAMES G. GILLILAND, JR. Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE INC. STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AMENDING THE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER TO REFLECT THE SAME Case No. CV 08-03251 WHA 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?