Dobbins v. Cox

Filing 5

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 03/27/09. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 12, 2008. This civil rights action by a prisoner was filed on August The court notified Plaintiff in writing at that time that v. CORRECTIONAL SERGEANT COX, Defendant. / ORDER OF DISMISSAL CLARENCE DOBBINS, Plaintiff, No. C-08-3857 TEH (PR) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA the action was deficient because Plaintiff did not pay the requisite $ 350.00 filing fee or, instead, submit a signed and completed court-approved in forma pauperis application, including a completed certificate of funds in the prisoner's account and a copy of the prisoner's trust account statement for the last six months. USC 1915(a)(2). See 28 Plaintiff was advised that failure to file the requested items within 30 days would result in dismissal of the action. More than seven months have elapsed since Plaintiff was 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 notified of his filing deficiency; however, Plaintiff has not provided the court with the requisite items, or sought an extension of time to do so. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The clerk shall close the file and terminate all pending motions as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED 03/27/09 THELTON E. HENDERSON United States District Judge G:\PRO-SE\TEH\CR.08\Dobbins-08-3857-dismissal.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?