Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sabhlok et al
Filing
302
ORDER - NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED VERDICT FORM. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/21/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Verdict Form)(emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2010)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sabhlok et al
Doc. 302 Att. 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL C. PATTISON, Defendant. ___________________________________/ No. C-08-4238 EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
VERDICT
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Please provide a "yes" or "no" answer for each claim below. CLAIM 1 Do you find, by the preponderance of the evidence, that Defendant violated Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act? YES NO _____ _____
CLAIM 2 Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Defendant aided and abetted another person's violation of Rule 10b-5? YES NO _____ _____
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
CLAIM 3 Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Defendant aided and abetted a violation of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act by Embarcadero? YES NO _____ _____
CLAIM 4 Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Defendant violated Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act? YES NO _____ _____
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September ____, 2010 _________________________ Jury Foreperson Please sign and date below, and return this verdict to the Clerk. CLAIM 5 Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Defendant violated Rule 13b2-1 of the Exchange Act? YES NO _____ _____
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?