Kapisi v. Superior Court of California County of Monterey

Filing 16

ORDER OF DISMISSAL without prejudice because plaintiff failed to keep court informed of her address in compliacne with Local Rule 3-11(a). (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2009) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/15/2009: # 1 cs) (ys, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BARBARA KAPISI, Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA; et al., Defendants. / No. C 08-4314 SI (pr) ORDER OF DISMISSAL On March 3, 2009, mail was sent to plaintiff at the address she provided to the court and was returned undelivered on March 11, 2009. The envelope was marked "not in custody" as the reason for the return. (Docket # 8.) Plaintiff has not provided any address other than the one to which the undeliverable mail was sent. More than sixty days have passed since the mail was returned to the court undelivered. Plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 3-11(a) which requires that a party proceeding pro se must "promptly file with the Court and serve upon all opposing parties a Notice of Change of Address specifying the new address" when her address changes. Local Rule 3-11(b) allows the court to dismiss a complaint without prejudice when mail directed to a pro se party is returned as not deliverable and the pro se party fails to send a current address within sixty days of the return of the undelivered mail. For the foregoing reasons, this action is dismissed without prejudice because plaintiff failed to keep the court informed of her address in compliance with Local Rule 3-11(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 13, 2009 _______________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?