Rodriguez v. City & County of San Francisco
Filing
19
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 17 Plaintiff's Request for Relief from Judgment. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service). (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ,
9
Plaintiff,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO,
12
13
No. C-08-5257 MHP
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM
JUDGMENT
(Docket No. 17)
Defendant.
___________________________________/
14
15
16
Mr. Rodriguez, the pro se plaintiff in this case, has filed a motion for relief from judgment
17
under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Mr. Rodriguez’s motion, however, fails to
18
provide any information about the judgment from which he seeks relief, or the grounds for his
19
request. His motion contains no content other than an unexplained citation to Title VI of the Civil
20
Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination by programs receiving federal funding. See 42
21
U.S.C. § 2000d. The only substantive order in this case, to which Mr. Rodriguez’s motion
22
presumably applies, denies his application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismisses his complaint
23
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court, finding that Mr. Rodriguez had filed numerous
24
meritless complaints against similar parties based on similar allegations, also ordered his future
25
complaints to be subject to pre-filing review.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
2
As Mr. Rodriguez fails to identify any facts or argument showing that he is entitled to relief
from judgment, his motion DENIED.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: February 4, 2013
7
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?