McLaughlin v. Curry
ORDER PERMITTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2010) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/29/2010: # 1 cs) (ys, COURT STAFF).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LARRY McLAUGHLIN, Petitioner, v. BEN CURRY, warden, Respondent. /
No. C 08-5599 SI (pr) ORDER PERMITTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS
A recent en banc decision from the Ninth Circuit addressed important issues relating to federal review of parole decisions, Hayward v Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. April 22, 2010) (en banc). The court will provide each party an opportunity to submit a supplemental brief (not to exceed 15 pages in length) explaining his views of how the Hayward en banc decision applies to this parole denial habeas case. The court sets the following schedule: 1. No later than May 10, 2010, respondent must send to petitioner a copy of the Hayward
en banc decision. 2. No later than May 28, 2010, respondent must file and serve any supplemental brief on
the impact of Hayward on this action. 3. No later than July 2, 2010, petitioner must file and serve any supplemental brief on the
impact of Hayward on this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 27, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?