Wilson v. Tilton
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING 24 MOTION TO REINSTATE ORDER TO LIFT STAY; DIRECTING CLERK TO ADMINISTRATIVELY REOPEN ACTION; DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AMENDED PETITION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 20, 2011. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/20/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
CLINTON BRIAN WILSON,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of
)
Department of Corrections,
)
)
Respondent.
)
______________________________ )
No. C 09-0143 MMC (PR)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
REINSTATE ORDER TO LIFT
STAY; DIRECTING CLERK TO
ADMINISTRATIVELY REOPEN
ACTION; DIRECTING PETITIONER
TO FILE AMENDED PETITION
(Docket No. 24)
14
15
On January 13, 2009, petitioner, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the
16
above-titled petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Thereafter, the
17
Court stayed the petition and administratively closed the case while petitioner returned to state
18
court to exhaust state remedies. By order filed October 22, 2010, the Court granted
19
petitioner’s request to reopen the case and file an amended petition. In so doing, the Court
20
directed petitioner to file his amended petition within thirty days of the date the Court’s order
21
was filed.
22
On December 17, 2010, the Court dismissed the instant action without prejudice due to
23
petitioner’s failure to file an amended petition or otherwise communicate with the Court within
24
thirty days of the Court’s October 22, 2010 order.
25
Now before the Court is petitioner’s motion, filed February 4, 2011, to reinstate the
26
Court’s October 22, 2010 order lifting the stay. Petitioner also renews his request for leave to
27
file an amended petition. Petitioner states he was unable to file an amended petition or
28
otherwise communicate with the Court within thirty days of the Court’s October 22, 2010
1 order because he did not receive the order until November 22, 2010, and that shortly thereafter,
2 on December 1, 2010, petitioner’s legal files were “pre-transfer transpacked” in preparation for
3 petitioner’s transfer to Pleasant Valley State Prison (“PVSP”). Petitioner states he was
4 transferred to PVSP on December 6, 2010 and was separated from his property until
5 approximately January 4, 2010.
6
Good cause appearing, the Court orders as follows:
7
1. Petitioner’s request to reopen the instant action is hereby GRANTED, and the Clerk
8 is directed to ADMINISTRATIVELY REOPEN the instant action .
9
2. Within thirty (30) days of the date this order is filed, petitioner shall file an amended
11 form petition along with instructions for completing it are provided to petitioner herewith. The
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10 petition, using the Court’s form petition, containing all of his exhausted claims. A copy of the
12 amended petition must include the caption and civil case number used in this order, No. C 0913 0143 MMC (PR), and must include the words AMENDED PETITION on the first page.
14
The amended petition supersedes the initial petition and may not incorporate any
15 part of it by reference. Petitioner must include in the amended petition all the claims he
16 wishes to present, and any attachments he wishes the Court to consider.
17
3. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to petitioner at his most recent
18 address of record at PVSP.
19
4. It is petitioner’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Petitioner must keep the Court
20 informed of any change of address and must comply with the Court’s orders in a timely
21 fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute
22 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
23
This order terminates Docket No. 24.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25 DATED: May 20, 2011
26
_________________________
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?