Ortega v. Indymac Federal Bank, FSB et al
Filing
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 5/29/2009 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 5/5/2009. (sclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2009) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/5/2009: # 1 proof of service) (tdm, COURT STAFF).
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JESUS RAMIREZ ORTEGA, Plaintiff, v. INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, FSB, NDEX WEST, LLC, and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendants.
United States District Court
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 09-0566 SC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On April 30, 2009, this case was reassigned to this chambers for all further proceedings. Order"). hearing. Docket No. 16 ("Reassignment
The Reassignment Order vacated all matters scheduled for Id. Before the case was reassigned, the Honorable
Bernard Zimmerman issued an order to show cause in writing by Monday, April 27, 2009, why this case should not be dismissed for the reasons argued in Defendant's motion to dismiss and for lack of prosecution. Docket No. 11. Magistrate Judge Zimmerman Id. Plaintiff
noticed a hearing on the order for May 20, 2009.
did not respond in writing to the order to show cause. The Court hereby issues a new Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed. Plaintiff must do so at a hearing
scheduled for May 29, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1, on the
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
For the Northern District of California
17th floor, U.S. Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. Plaintiff shall appear personally if he
wished to proceed pro se, or may do so through counsel if he has secured new counsel. At the hearing, Plaintiff should explain why
he has failed to respond to Defendant's motion to dismiss. Alternatively, if Plaintiff does not wish to pursue this case, he may dismiss it and not respond to this Order to Show Cause. Defendant's attorneys are ORDERED to serve this Order, along with a copy of the motion to dismiss, on Plaintiff personally. Defendant's attorneys must file a proof of service
United States District Court
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
with the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 5, 2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
