Bender v. Micrel Incorporated

Filing 29

PRETRIAL ORDER/ order setting litigation schedule (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-01144-SI Document28 Filed10/30/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 David N. Kuhn - State Bar No. 73389 Attorney-at-Law 144 Hagar Avenue Piedmont, CA 94611 Telephone: (510) 653-4983 E-mail: dnkuhn@pacbell.net Attorney for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Gregory Bender MARK E. MILLER (State Bar #130200) mmiller@omm.com ANNE E. HUFFSMITH (State Bar #236438) ahuffsmith@omm.com O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant MICREL, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 GREGORY BENDER, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER NO. 3:09-CV-1144 Case No. C09-01144 SI [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, v. MICREL, INC., Defendant and Counterclaimant. Case3:09-cv-01144-SI Document28 Filed10/30/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to the Court's Order during the parties' October 23, 2009 Case Management Conference, the parties, through their counsel, hereby STIPULATE and AGREE to the below schedule: ACTIVITY Initial disclosures (FRCP 26) Bender to serve Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions and accompanying documents (Patent L.R. 3-1, 3-2) Last day to amend pleadings Micrel to serve Invalidity Contentions and accompanying documents (Patent L.R. 3-3, 3-4) Parties to exchange Proposed Terms and Claim Elements for Construction (Patent L.R. 4-1) Parties to exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence (Patent L.R. 4-2) Parties to file Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (Patent L.R. 4-3) Completion of Claim Construction Discovery (Patent L.R. 4-4) Case Management Conference Bender' Opening Claim Construction Brief and supporting evidence (Patent L.R. 4-5(a)) Micrel's Responsive Claim Construction Brief and supporting evidence (Patent L.R. 4-5(b)) Bender' Reply Claim Construction Brief and supporting evidence (Patent L.R. 4-5(c)) Technology Tutorial Hearing Claim construction hearing Close of fact discovery Last day to serve expert disclosures and reports (FRCP 26(a)(2)) Last day to serve rebuttal expert reports Close of expert discovery Last day to file dispositive motions Pre-trial disclosures (FRCP 26(a)(3)) Final pretrial conference Trial -2PROPOSED DATES October 16, 2009 November 6, 2009 November 27, 2009 December 21, 2009 January 4, 2010 January 25, 2010 February 19, 2010 March 22, 2010 June 11, 2010 at 3 p.m. August 4, 2010 August 18, 2010 August 25, 2010 September 8, 2010 (2hrs @ 3:30 p.m.) September 9, 2010 (2hrs @ 3:30 p.m.) December 3, 2010 January 14, 2011 February 11, 2011 March 11, 2011 May 20, 2011 hrg: 6/24/11 @ 9 a.m. December 2, 2011 January 10, 2012 @ 3:30 p.m. January 30, 2012 @ 8:30 a.m. [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER NO. 3:09-CV-1144 Case3:09-cv-01144-SI Document28 Filed10/30/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED: 20 21 Dated: _________________________ 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER NO. 3:09-CV-1144 Respectfully submitted, Dated: October 30, 2009 By: David N. Kuhn Attorney-at-Law 144 Hagar Avenue Piedmont, California 94611 Telephone: (510) 653-4983 Counsel for Plaintiff Gregory Bender Dated: October 30, 2009 By: / Mark E. Miller O'Melveny & Myers LLP Counsel for Defendants and Counterclaimant MICREL, INC. Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above-listed signatories. Respectfully submitted, Dated: October 30, 2009 By: David N. Kuhn Counsel for Plaintiff Gregory Bender _____________________________________ Judge Susan Illston United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?