Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 220

MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal and/or Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Martin F. Gutierrez, Dennis Hollingsworth, Mark A. Jansson, Gail J. Knight, Proposition 8 Official Proponents, - Yes on 8, A Project of California Renewal, Hak-Shing William Tam. Motion Hearing set for 1/7/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Jesse Panuccio, #2 Proposed Order)(Cooper, Charles) (Filed on 10/8/2009) Modified on 10/9/2009 (ewn, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Case: 09-16959 10/02/2009 Page: 1 of 2 DktEntry: 7082415 FILED U N IT E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OCT 02 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S K R IS T IN M. PERRY; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. A R N O L D SCHWARZENEGGER, in his o f f ic ia l capacity as Governor of California; et al., Defendants, P R O P O S IT IO N 8 OFFICIAL P R O P O N E N T S ; et al., Defendant-intervenors, C A M P A I G N FOR CALIFORNIA F A M IL IE S , Defendant-Proposed Intervenor Appellant, v. O U R FAMILY COALITION; et al., Plaintiff-intervenors - Appellees. N o . 09-16959 D .C . No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW N o rth ern District of California, San Francisco ORDER A p p ellan t's second motion to expedite the appeal is granted. The opening brief submitted on September 25, 2009 has been filed. The answering brief remains due October 9, 2009. 28Sept2009/LBS/Pro M o Case: 09-16959 10/02/2009 Page: 2 of 2 DktEntry: 7082415 09-16959 T h e optional reply brief is due 7 days after the service date of the last-served an sw erin g brief. The provisions of Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(a) shall not be applicable to this case; any Rule 31-2.2(b) request is strongly disfavored. T h is case shall be placed on the November 2009 calendar. Court records do not currently reflect that the district court has issued the certificate of record. The appellant shall monitor the issuance of the certificate. For the Court: MOLLY C. DWYER C le rk of the Court L o rela Bragado-Sevillena D e p u ty Clerk Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7/Advisory Note to Rule 27 and Ninth Circuit Rule 27-10 2 8 S e p t2 0 0 9 /L B S /P r o Mo 0 9 -1 6 9 5 9

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?