Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 280

MOTION in Limine filed by Paul T. Katami, Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Jeffrey J. Zarrillo. Motion Hearing set for 12/16/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Jeremy M. Goldman, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration, #4 Exhibit C to Declaration, #5 Exhibit D to Declaration, #6 Exhibit E to Declaration, #7 Exhibit F to Declaration)(Goldman, Jeremy) (Filed on 12/7/2009)

Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Doc. 280 Att. 1

Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document280-2

Filed12/07/09 Page1 of 3

EXHIBIT A

Dockets.Justia.com

Caase3009ccv002292VRW Document280-2 Filed08/19/09 Page1 of 23 C se3: : 9- - v- - 2292- -VRW Document160 Filed12/07/09 Page2 of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTE ORDER VAUGHN R. WALKER United States District Chief Judge DATE: August 19, 2009 COURTROOM DEPUTY: Cora Klein CASE NO. C 09-2292 VRW CASE TITLE: KRISTIN PERRY et al v. ARNOLD SCHWARNEGGER et al PLAINTIFF INTERVENORS: Our Family Coalition: Shannon P Minter, Christopher Stoll, James Esseks, Elizabeth Gill, Matthew Coles, Jennifer Pizer Court Reporter: Belle Ball

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS: David Boies, Theodore B Olson Theodore Boutrous, Christopher Dusseault Theane Kapur, Enrique Monagas Jeremy Goldman, Theodore Uno Matthew D McGill PLAINTIFF INTERVENOR: City and County of San Francisco: Therese Stewart, Christine Van Aken Erin Bernstein, Dennis Herrera DEFENDANTS: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Mark Horton, Linette Scott: Kenneth C Mennemeier Edmund G Brown- Attorney General of California: Gordon Burns, Tamar Pachter

Patrick O'Connell - Clerk Recorder for County of Alameda: Claude Kolm, Lindsey Stern Dean C Logan - Registrar Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles: Judy Whitehurst INTERVENOR DEFENDANTS: Prop 8 Official Proponents and protectmarriage.com: Charles J Cooper David H Thompson Campaign For California Families: Rena Lindevaldsen

Caase3009ccv002292VRW Document280-2 Filed08/19/09 Page2 of 23 C se3: : 9- - v- - 2292- -VRW Document160 Filed12/07/09 Page3 of

PROCEEDINGS and RESULTS: The Court heard argument from counsels and ruled as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. Motion to intervene as party plaintiffs filed by the Our Family coalition, Doc #79 denied. Motion for intervention as intervenor-defendant filed by Campaign for California Families, Doc # 91 - denied. Motion to intervene filed by City and County of San Francisco, Doc #109 - granted in part to allow San Francisco to present issue of alleged effect on governmental interests. Trial setting and scheduling as follows: a. Designation of witnesses presenting evidence under FRE 702, 703 or 705 and production of written reports pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(2)(B): October 2, 2009; b. Dispositive motions to be served and filed so as to be heard on October 14, 2009 at 10 AM; c. Completion of all discovery, except for evidence intended solely to contradict or rebut evidence on the same subject matter identified by another party under FRCP 26(a)(2)(B): November 30, 2009; d. Completion of discovery on the same subject matter identified by another party under FRCP 26(a)(2)(B): December 31, 2009; see FRCP 26(a)(2)(C)(ii); e. Pretrial conference: December 16, 2009 at 10 AM; f. Trial: January 11, 2010 at 8:30 AM. With respect to any disputes regarding discovery, counsel are directed to comply with Civ LR 37-1(b) and the court's standing order 1.5. In the absence of the assigned judge, counsel are directed to bring any discovery disputes before Magistrate Judge Joseph C Spero.

5. 6.