Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 301

RESPONSE to re #294 Statement of Objections to Evidence by City and County of San Francisco, Paul T. Katami, Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Jeffrey J. Zarrillo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Olson, Theodore) (Filed on 12/11/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Theodore B. Olson, SBN 38137 [e-mail] Matthew D. McGill, pro hac vice Amir C. Tayrani, SBN 229609 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone] Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., SBN 132009 [e-mail] Christopher D. Dusseault, SBN 177557 Ethan D. Dettmer, SBN 196046 Sarah E. Piepmeier, SBN 227094 Theane Evangelis Kapur, SBN 243570 Enrique A. Monagas, SBN 239087 333 S. Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone] BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP David Boies, pro hac vice [e-mail] Theodore H. Uno, SBN 248603 333 Main Street, Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; EDMUND G. BROWN JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O'CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; and DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants.
09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEMONSTRATIVES

CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEMONSTRATIVES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

Plaintiffs Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo ("Plaintiffs"), Plaintiff-Intervenor City and County of San Francisco ("Plaintiff-Intervenor"), Defendant-Intervenors Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight, Martin F. Gutierrez, Hak-Shing William Tam, and Mark A. Jansson; and ProtectMarriage.com ­ Yes on 8, A Project of California Renewal ("Defendant-Intervenors"), and Defendants Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown Jr., Mark B. Horton, Linette Scott, Patrick O'Connell, and Dean C. Logan ("Defendants") (collectively the "Parties"), through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to the following regarding the admissibility of demonstratives in this matter: 1. The Parties stipulate and agree that the Parties shall exchange demonstrative exhibits

to be used with a given witness at least 72 hours prior to the witness's testimony. 2. The Parties stipulate and agree that any demonstrative exhibit disclosed pursuant to

Paragraph 1 above shall be admissible into evidence to the same extent as if it had been disclosed on the Parties' exhibits lists. 3. Nothing in this stipulation limits in any way the right of any Party to object to the

admissibility of a demonstrative on any other grounds. 4. This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and facsimile signatures are deemed

originals for all purposes. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// 1
09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEMONSTRATIVES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

DATED: December 11, 2009

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

By: and

/s/ Christopher D. Dusseault

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP David Boies Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO DATED: December 11, 2009 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY

By:

/s/ Ronald P. Flynn

Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DATED: December 11, 2009 COOPER AND KIRK, PLLC

By:

/s/ Nicole J. Moss

Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS; and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM ­ YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL DATED: December 11, 2009 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

By:

/s/ Tamar Pachter

Attorneys for Defendant ATTORNEY GENERAL EDMUND G. BROWN JR.

2
09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEMONSTRATIVES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

DATED: December 11, 2009

MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP

By:

/s/ Andrew W. Stroud

Attorneys for Defendants ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARK B. HORTON, and LINETTE SCOTT (the "Administration Defendants") DATED: December 11, 2009 THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL

By:

/s/ Claude F. Kolm, Deputy County Counsel

Attorneys for Defendant PATRICK O'CONNELL, Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda DATED: December 11, 2009 THE OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL

By:

/s/ Judy Whitehurst

Attorneys for Defendant DEAN C. LOGAN, Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:_____________________

______________________________________ HON. VAUGHN R. WALKER United States District Chief Judge

3
09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEMONSTRATIVES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 45 Pursuant to General Order No. 45 of the Northern District of California, I attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories to this document.

By:

/s/ Sarah E. Piepmeier

4
09-CV-2292 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEMONSTRATIVES