Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 395

MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Richard E. Coleson ( Filing fee $ 210, receipt number 34611040770.) filed by Doug Swardstrom. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2010)

Download PDF
Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al Doc. 395 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document395 Richard E. Coleson 1 South 6th Street 1 Terre Haute, IN 47807-35 10 1 (812) 232-2434 Filed01/06/10 Page1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I Kristin M. Perry, et al., CASE NO. Plaintiff(s), v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, in his official capacity as Governor of California, et al., Defendant(s). a?-d~w&d APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 1 1-3, R i c h r d E. Coleson good standing of the bar of Indiana , an active member in , hereby applies for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis representing Doug Swardstroln in the above-entitled action. In support of this application, I certify on oath that: 1. I am an active meinber in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; 2. 1 agree to abide by the Standards of Professional Conduct set forth in Civil Local Rule 11-4, to coinply with General Order No. 45, Electronic Case Filing, and to become familiar with the Local Rules and the Alternative Dispute Resolution programs of this Court; and, 3. An attorney who is a meinber of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office within the State of California has been designated as cocounsel in the above-entitled action. The name, address and telephone number of that attorney is: Eric Grant (91 6) 388-0833 Hicks Thomas LLP; 8001 Folsom Blvd., Suite 100; Sacramento, CA 95826 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. fl Dated: /Id&. 5" J')/'O ,

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?