Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 768

MOTION to Vacate Judgment filed by Martin F. Gutierrez, Dennis Hollingsworth, Mark A. Jansson, Gail J. Knight, ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, A Project of California Renewal. Motion Hearing set for 7/11/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Cooper, Charles) (Filed on 4/25/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

COOPER AND KIRK, PLLC
Charles J. Cooper (DC Bar No. 248070)*
[e-mail]
David H. Thompson (DC Bar No. 450503)*
[e-mail]
Howard C. Nielson, Jr. (DC Bar No. 473018)*
[e-mail]
Nicole J. Moss (DC Bar No. 472424)*
[e-mail]
Peter A. Patterson (Ohio Bar No. 0080840)*
[e-mail]
1523 New Hampshire Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone]
LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW P. PUGNO
Andrew P. Pugno (CA Bar No. 206587)
[e-mail]
101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 100, Folsom, California 95630
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone]
ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND
Brian W. Raum (NY Bar No. 2856102)*
[e-mail]
James A. Campbell (OH Bar No. 0081501)*
[e-mail]
15100 North 90th Street, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone]

17

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH,
GAIL J. KNIGHT, MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ, MARK A. JANSSON,
and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM – YES ON 8, A
PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL

18

* Admitted pro hac vice

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19
20
21
22

KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER,
PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J.
ZARRILLO,
Plaintiffs,

23
24

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

25
26
27
28

Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.

CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 JW
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS
DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL
J. KNIGHT, MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ,
MARK A. JANSSON, AND
PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM’S
MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT

EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official
capacity as Governor of California; KAMALA
D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 JW

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in
his official capacity as Director of the California
Department of Public Health and State Registrar
of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her
official capacity as Deputy Director of Health
Information & Strategic Planning for the
California Department of Public Health;
PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his official capacity
as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda;
and DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity
as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for
the County of Los Angeles,

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Defendants,
and
PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS
DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J.
KNIGHT, MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ, HAKSHING WILLIAM TAM, and MARK A.
JANSSON; and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM –
YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA
RENEWAL,
Defendant-Intervenors.

15
16

Additional Counsel for Defendant-Intervenors

17

21

ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND
Jordan W. Lorence (DC Bar No. 385022)*
[e-mail]
Austin R. Nimocks (TX Bar No. 24002695)*
[e-mail]
801 G Street NW, Suite 509, Washington, D.C. 20001
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone]

22

* Admitted pro hac vice

18
19
20

23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 JW

1
2
3

Defendant-Intervenors Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight, Martin F. Gutierrez, Mark A.
Jansson, and ProtectMarriage.com – Yes on 8, A Project of California Renewal have filed a
motion to vacate the judgment and all prior orders entered in this case on the grounds that the

4
then-presiding judge was disqualified from this action. Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 62.1(a)(3), the
5
6

Court states that it would GRANT Defendant-Intervenors’ motion and VACATE the judgment

7

and all prior orders if the court of appeals remands for that purpose.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10
11

Dated the ________ of _______, 2011

____________________________
Chief Judge James Ware

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 JW