Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 8

MOTION to Intervene filed by Proposition 8 Official Proponents, Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight, Martin F. Gutierrez, Hak-Shing William Tam, Mark A. Jansson, ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, A Project of California Renewal. Motion Hearing set for 7/2/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Proposed Order, #16 Certificate of Service)(Chandler, Timothy) (Filed on 5/28/2009)

Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Doc. 8 Att. 11

Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document8-12

Filed05/28/09 Page1 of 2

Exhibit L

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 8:09-cv-00286-DOC-MLG Document8-12 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document 17

Filed05/28/09 Page2 of 2 1 of 1 Filed 05/06/2009 Page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. SACV 09-286 DOC (MLGx) Title: SMELT ET AL V UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL DOCKET ENTRY
[I hereby certify that this document was served by first class mail or Government messenger service, postage prepaid, to all counsel (or parties) at their respective most recent address of record in this action on this date.] Date:____________ Deputy Clerk: ___________________________________

Date: May 6, 2009

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE Kristee Hopkins Courtroom Clerk Not Present Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: NONE PRESENT NONE PRESENT

PROCEEDING (IN CHAMBERS): GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE On April 10, 2009, Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail Knight, Martin Gutierrez, Hak-Shing William Tam, Mark Jansson and ProtectMarriage.com (the "Proposed Interveners") filed a Motion to Intervene in this case, under either FED. R. CIV. P. 24(a)(2) or FED. R. CIV. P. 24(b)(1)(B) (the "Motion"). Defendant State of California, on April 27, 2009, filed a Notice of Non-Opposition to the instant Motion. Defendant United States of America filed a statement avering that it "takes no position" regarding the instant Motion. Plaintiffs' opposition, if any, was due on April 27, 2009. As of this date, the Court has not received an opposition. Accordingly, the Motion is hereby GRANTED as unopposed. The Proposed Interveners' request to intervene is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties to the action.

MINUTES FORM 11 DOC CIVIL - GEN

Initials of Deputy Clerk _kh_ Page 1 of 1