Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 51

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 17, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/17/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

DANIEL RODRIGUEZ,
Plaintiff,

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12
13

No. C-09-2668 MMC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION

v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Defendant.

/

14
15

By order filed December 6, 2010, the Court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary

16

judgment and remanded the above-titled matter to the Commissioner of the Social Security

17

Administration, with directions to further consider plaintiff’s application for SSI benefits.

18

Thereafter, on May 10, 2011, plaintiff filed a document titled “That Party May Produce a

19

Legible Paroled, or Copy and Seek Reconsideration of the Instant Order,” citing, inter alia,

20

Rules 60(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

21

The Court having read and considered plaintiff’s May 10, 2011 motion, the motion is

22

hereby DENIED, for the reason that plaintiff has failed to identify any cognizable basis for

23

reconsideration of the Court’s December 6, 2010 order. Moreover, by said order, as noted,

24

the Court ruled in plaintiff’s favor.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: May 17, 2011
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge