Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
51
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 17, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/17/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ,
Plaintiff,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
No. C-09-2668 MMC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Defendant.
/
14
15
By order filed December 6, 2010, the Court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary
16
judgment and remanded the above-titled matter to the Commissioner of the Social Security
17
Administration, with directions to further consider plaintiff’s application for SSI benefits.
18
Thereafter, on May 10, 2011, plaintiff filed a document titled “That Party May Produce a
19
Legible Paroled, or Copy and Seek Reconsideration of the Instant Order,” citing, inter alia,
20
Rules 60(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
21
The Court having read and considered plaintiff’s May 10, 2011 motion, the motion is
22
hereby DENIED, for the reason that plaintiff has failed to identify any cognizable basis for
23
reconsideration of the Court’s December 6, 2010 order. Moreover, by said order, as noted,
24
the Court ruled in plaintiff’s favor.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: May 17, 2011
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?