Bell v. Alameda County Sheriff et al

Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/27/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint for damages under 42 U.S.C. 1983 alleging that, while he was incarcerated at the Alameda County Jail ("ACJ"), he received inadequate medical care for a serious skin infection. Per order filed on March 15, 2010, the court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend to allege deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, if possible. Plaintiff was advised that he must name individual defendants and allege how each of them actually and proximately caused the deprivation of a federally protected right. The court made clear that failure to file a proper amended complaint within 30 days would result in the dismissal of this action. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ERIC W. BELL, Plaintiff(s), vs. GREG AHERN, Sheriff, Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 09-3998 CRB (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 More than 30 days have passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or sought an extension of time to do so. The action is dismissed for failure to state a claim under the authority of 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). The clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this order and close the file. SO ORDERED. DATED: April 27, 2010 CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge G:\PRO-SE\CRB\CR.09\Bell, E2.dismissal.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?