Serrano v. People of The State of California

Filing 10

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/16/09. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On November 5, 2009, the court notified petitioner in writing that his action for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 was deficient because he did not pay the requisite $5.00 filing fee or, instead, submit a signed and completed court-approved in forma pauperis application, including a completed certificate of funds in the prisoner's account and a copy of the prisoner's trust account statement for the last six months. Petitioner was advised that failure to file the requested items within 30 days would result in dismissal of the action. More than 40 days have elapsed; however, petitioner still has not filed the requisite items or sought an extension of time to do so. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice to filing a new habeas action accompanied by the requisite $5.00 filing fee or a signed and completed in forma pauperis application. The clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this order, terminate all pending motions as moot and close the file. SO ORDERED. DATED: Dec. 16, 2009 ______________________ CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AMADOR SERRANO, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) ) Respondent. ______________________________ ) No. C 09-5102 CRB (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\CRB\HC.09\Serrano, A1.dsifp.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?