Choyce v. San Francisco Sheriff Department et al

Filing 36

ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White denying 31 Motion for Order to Show Cause; denying 32 Motion for Leave to File (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2011)

Choyce v. San Francisco Sheriff Department et al

Doc. 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion for leavfe to "file" interrogatories. Plaintiff may take discovery from Defendants, but he may not file discovery requests with the Court. Rather, he must serve interrogatories and other requests for discovery directly upon defense counsel. His motion for leave to file interrogatories with the Court (docket number 32) is DENIED. Plaintiff has also filed a motion for an order to show cause in which he argues that Defendants' motion for summary judgment should be denied. Plaintiff's arguments will // // BENJAMIN CHOYCE, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, OFFICER MARTIN, ) OFFICER CHIBA, OFFICER LOZANO, ) LIEUTENANT TILTON, SERGEANT ) ) HASKELL, SERGEANT LASATER, S.D. ANDERSON, S.D. LEIU, OFFICER ) ) PINEDA, LIEUTENANT WONG, ) ) Defendants. _________________________________ ) No. C 09-5402 JSW (PR) ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE INTERROGATORIES AND FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(Docket Nos. 31 & 32)

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

be considered as part of his opposition to summary judgment, but there is no need for an order to show cause. Consequently, the motion for an order to show cause (docket number 31) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 25, 2011 JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge

2