Milton v. Jacquez et al

Filing 23

ORDER by Judge William Alsup granting 22 Motion for Extension of Time to File (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2010)

Milton v. Jacquez et al

Doc. 23

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ROBERT S. MILTON, Plaintiff, v. F. JACQUEZ, Warden; M. CATE, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation; C.M. PATTEN, Captain; J. AKIN, Lieutenant; D. W. BRADBURY, Associate Warden; CHAUCER, Sergeant; J. FRISK, Sergeant; C. PARRY, Lieutenant, Defendants. / No. C 09-5785 WHA (PR) ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

(Docket No. 22)

Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983. On January 7, 2010, the complaint was ordered served upon defendants F. Jacquez, C.M. Patten, J. Akin, D. W. Bradbury, Chaucer, J. Frisk, C. Parry, and M. Cate. Defendants were ordered to file, within ninety days, a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion, or a notice that they are of the opinion that this case cannot be resolved by dispositive motion. On July 7, 2010, defendants filed an answer, but they have not filed either the dispositive motion or the notice that they were ordered to file. Their deadline was extended to August 13, 2010, but still they did not comply with the deadline. On December 10, 2010, nearly four months after the deadline expired, defendants have asked for a further extension of time to February 10, 2010. Their only explanation is that hey have had too much other work to

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

do to complete the necessary depositions. The request for an extension of time will be GRANTED, and if they wish to file a dispositive motion they must do so, in compliance with the order of service, on or before February 10, 2010. Given defendants' history of not complying with the court's deadlines, however, no further extensions of time will be granted for any reason and defendants' will not be given another opportunity to file a dispositive motion in this matter. Plaintiff's opposition is due on or before March 10, 2010. Defendants shall file a reply brief within 14 days of the date the opposition is filed; if defendants fail to file a timely reply brief, their motion may be denied on that basis. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 23 , 2010

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

G:\PRO-SE\WHA\CR.09\MILTON5785.EOT.wpd

2