Perez et al v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. et al

Filing 9

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 2, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2010) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/2/2010: # 1 Certificate of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AMELIA D PEREZ and CONSTANTINO R. PEREZ, JR., Plaintiffs, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A., BANK OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive. Defendants. / No. C 09-05942 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed this action alleging various claims to challenge the validity of their mortgage loan. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss scheduled to be heard on February 18, 2010. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, any brief in opposition to the motion was due on January 28, 2010, but no such opposition was received. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to respond by NOON ON FEBRUARY 25, 2010, and show cause for their failure to respond to the motion in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or alternately to file a statement of nonopposition to the motion as required by Civil Local Rule 7-3(b). This order to show cause does not constitute permission to file a late opposition. The hearing scheduled for February 18, 2010, is VACATED. A new hearing will be noticed by the Court if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 2, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?