Perkins v. Olson et al

Filing 14

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Vaughn R Walker on 10/8/2010. (Attachments: # 1 proof of service)(cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2010)

Perkins v. Olson et al

Doc. 14

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint under 42 USC § 1983 against three San Francisco Police Officers claiming they used excessive force against him during his arrest. Doc #1. After v SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICERS OLSON, LUCAS AND KENNEY, Defendant(s). / RODERICK PERKINS, Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL No C-10-0156-VRW (PR) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

reviewing the complaint, on July 28, 2010, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve defendants. Doc #5. On August 3,

2010, the order of service sent to plaintiff by the clerk was returned as undeliverable. Doc #6.

More than two months have elapsed since the mail sent to plaintiff was returned as undeliverable and plaintiff has failed to provide the court with a current mailing address. Because more than

sixty days have passed since the court's mail to plaintiff was

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

returned, the case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b). The Clerk shall close the file and terminate all pending motions as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED. VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge

G:\PRO-SE\VRW\CR.10\Perkins-10-156-order of dismissal-clr-3-11-b.wpd

2