Tran v. Fidelity Keegan et al
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 26, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2010) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/27/2010: # 1 Proof of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed twelve claims relating to a mortgage loan that he obtained. Defendants JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., California Reconveyance Company and Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss scheduled to be heard on May 13, 2010. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, any brief in opposition to the motion from plaintiff was due on April 22, 2010, but no such opposition has been received. Plaintiff is ORDERED to respond by MAY 10, 2010, AT NOON, and show cause for his failure to respond to the motion in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or alternately to file statement of nonopposition to the motion as required by Civil Local Rule 7-3(b). This order to show cause v. FIDELITY KEEGAN, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC., METROCITIES MORTGAGE, LLC, DBA NO RED TAPE MORTGAGE, J.P. MORGAN CHASE, CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, PROSPECT MORTGAGE, and DOES 1 to 100, Defendants. / ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HAI QUOC TRAN, Plaintiff, No. C 10-00882 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
does not constitute permission to file a late opposition. The hearing scheduled for May 13, 2010, is VACATED. A new hearing shall be noticed by the Court if necessary. Plaintiff's failure to respond to the order to show cause will likely result in dismissal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 26, 2010.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?