Turner v. Aurora Loan Services LLC
Filing
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING Show Cause Response due by 8/5/2010.. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 19, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2010)
<![CDATA[
Turner v. Aurora Loan Services LLC
Doc. 15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DOROTHY L. TURNER, Plaintiff, v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC, and any and all persons unknown, claiming any legal right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the property described in the complaint adverse to Plaintiff's title, or any cloud on Plaintiff's title thereto, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. / ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING No. C 10-02409 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Defendants moved to dismiss this predatory lending action on June 8, 2010, for a hearing noticed on August 5. The motion and notice of the hearing date were both served on pro se plaintiff Dorothy L. Turner via Federal Express overnight delivery (Dkt. Nos. 5, 13). Under the 35-day briefing schedule set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff was supposed to file an opposition brief to defendants' motion to dismiss by July 15. No opposition brief has been filed. Due to this failure, the hearing on this motion scheduled for August 5 is VACATED. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. A written response to this order -- in which plaintiff must explain why she has not filed a timely opposition brief and set forth reasons why defendants' motion should not be granted -- must be received by the Court no later than AUGUST 5. Plaintiff is warned that failure to
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
respond to this order by the deadline will likely result in the immediate dismissal of her case. If plaintiff files an opposition brief and provides an adequate explanation for her untimely filing, a new hearing date may be scheduled if necessary. Otherwise, the motion will be resolved on the papers.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 19, 2010.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
