Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
1018
FINAL CHARGE TO THE JURY AND SPECIAL VERDICT FORM. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 30, 2012. (Attachments: #1 Special Verdict Form)(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. C 10-03561 WHA
v.
GOOGLE INC.,
14
SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
Defendant.
/
15
16
YOUR ANSWERS MUST BE UNANIMOUS.
17
1.
18
group:
19
As to the compilable code for the 37 Java API packages in question taken as a
A.
Has Oracle proven that Google has infringed the overall structure,
20
sequence and organization of copyrighted works?
21
Yes __________
No __________
22
23
(IF YOU ANSWER “NO” TO QUESTION 1A, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION NO. 2.)
24
25
B.
Has Google proven that its use of the overall structure, sequence
26
and organization constituted “fair use”?
27
Yes __________
28
No __________
1
2.
2
group:
3
As to the documentation for the 37 Java API packages in question taken as a
A.
4
Has Oracle proven that Google has infringed?
Yes __________
No __________
5
6
(IF YOU ANSWER “NO” TO QUESTION 2A, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION NO. 3.)
7
8
B.
9
constituted “fair use”?
10
Yes __________
No __________
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
Has Google proven that its use of Oracle’s Java documentation
12
3.
Has Oracle proven that Google’s conceded use of the following was infringing,
13
the only issue being whether such use was de minimis:
14
Yes
(Infringing)
No
(Not Infringing)
A. The rangeCheck method in
TimSort.java and
ComparableTimSort.Java
_______
_______
B. Source code in seven “Impl.java”
files and the one “ACL” file
_______
_______
C. The English-language comments in
CodeSourceTest.java and
CollectionCertStoreParameters
Test.java
_______
_______
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
4.
2
1A.
3
Answer the following special interrogatories only if you answer “yes” to Question
A.
Has Google proven that Sun and/or Oracle engaged in conduct Sun and/or
4
Oracle knew or should have known would reasonably lead Google to
5
believe that it would not need a license to use the structure, sequence, and
6
organization of the copyrighted compilable code?
7
Yes __________
No __________
8
9
B.
If so, has Google proven that it in fact reasonably relied on such conduct
by Sun and/or Oracle in deciding to use the structure, sequence, and
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
organization of the copyrighted compilable code without obtaining a
12
license?
13
Yes __________
No __________
14
15
Your answers to Questions 4A and 4B will be used by the judge with issues he must
16
decide. Questions 4A and 4B do not bear on the issues you must decide on Questions 1
17
to 3.
18
19
20
21
Dated:
____________________________________
FOREPERSON
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?