Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
1108
COURTS PROPOSED CHARGE TO THE JURY. Signed by Judge Alsup on May 9, 2012. (Attachments: #1 Special Verdict Form)(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
No. C 10-03561 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
GOOGLE INC.,
14
Defendant.
/
15
16
YOUR ANSWERS MUST BE UNANIMOUS.
17
18
19
Direct Infringement
1.
Has Oracle proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Google directly
20
infringes claims 11, 27, 29, 39, 40, and 41 of United States Patent Number RE38,104?
21
Yes
(Infringing)
No
(Not Proven)
22
23
CLAIM 11:
________
________
24
CLAIM 27:
________
________
25
CLAIM 29:
________
________
26
CLAIM 39:
________
________
27
CLAIM 40:
________
________
28
CLAIM 41:
________
________
1
2
2.
Has Oracle proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Google directly
infringes claims 1, 8, 12, and 20 of United States Patent Number 6,061,520?
3
Yes
(Infringing)
4
No
(Not Proven)
5
CLAIM 1:
________
________
6
CLAIM 8:
________
________
7
CLAIM 12:
________
________
8
CLAIM 20:
________
________
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Indirect Infringement
3.
Has Oracle proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Google has induced or
13
contributed to any infringement of claims 11, 27, 29, 39, 40, and 41 of United States Patent
14
Number RE38,104? (Answer this question only as to the claim(s) for which you found “yes” in
15
Question No. 1)
16
Yes
(Infringing)
17
No
(Not Proven)
18
CLAIM 11:
________
________
19
CLAIM 27:
________
________
20
CLAIM 29:
________
________
21
CLAIM 39:
________
________
22
CLAIM 40:
________
________
23
CLAIM 41:
________
________
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
4.
Has Oracle proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Google has induced or
2
contributed to any infringement of claims 1, 8, 12, and 20 of United States Patent Number
3
6,061,520? (Answer this question only as to the claim(s) for which you found “yes” in
4
Question No. 2)
5
Yes
(Infringing)
6
No
(Not Proven)
CLAIM 1:
________
________
8
CLAIM 8:
________
________
9
CLAIM 12:
________
________
10
CLAIM 20:
________
________
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
12
13
14
Dated: May ___, 2012.
FOREPERSON
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
