Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1209

CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Joint Case Management Conference Statement filed by Oracle America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/18/2012)

EXHIBIT B
GOOGLE’S PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.

Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR)

11

Plaintiff,

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT

12

v.

13

GOOGLE INC.

14

Dept.: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor
Judge: Honorable William Alsup
Defendant.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FINAL JUDGMENT
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR)
sf- 3158625
673132.04

1
2

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

3

1.

4

dismissed with prejudice.
2.

5
6

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

On Oracle’s Claim for Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,061,520 (Count VII),

judgment is entered for Google.
8.

17
18

Oracle’s Claim for Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,910,205 (Count VI) is

dismissed with prejudice.

15
16

On Oracle’s Claim for Infringement of U.S. Patent No. RE38,104 (Count V),

judgment is entered for Google.

13
14

Oracle’s Claim for Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,426,720 (Count IV) is

dismissed with prejudice.

11
12

Oracle’s Claim for Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,966,702 (Count III) is

dismissed with prejudice.

9
10

Oracle’s Claim for Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,192,476 (Count II) is

dismissed with prejudice.

7
8

Oracle’s Claim for Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,125,447 (Count I) is

Oracle’s Claim for Copyright Infringement (Count VIII) is dismissed with

prejudice, except as follows:
A.

19

On the portion of Oracle’s Claim for Copyright Infringement relating to the

documentation for the accused 37 Java API packages, judgment is entered for Google.

20

B.

21

On the portion of Oracle’s Claim for Copyright Infringement relating to the

22

rangeCheck code in TimSort.java and ComparableTimSort.java, judgment is entered for

23

Oracle.
C.

24

On the portion of Oracle’s Claim for Copyright Infringement relating to the

25

English-language comments in CodeSourceTest.java and

26

CollectionCertStoreParametersTest.java, judgment is entered for Google.

27
28
FINAL JUDGMENT
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR)
sf- 3158625
673132.04

2

1
D.

2

On the portion of Oracle’s Claim for Copyright Infringement relating to the

3

eight decompiled files,1 judgment is entered for Oracle.

4

9.

5

’104 Patent (Count One), judgment is entered for Google.
10.

6
7

10

On Google’s Counterclaim for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the

’520 Patent (Count Five), judgment is entered for Google.
11.

8
9

On Google’s Counterclaim for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the

Google’s Counterclaims for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the

’702 (Count Three), ’447 (Count Seven), ’476 (Count Nine), ’205 (Count Eleven), and ’720
(Count Thirteen) Patents are dismissed as moot.
12.

11

Google’s Counterclaims for Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity of the ’104 (Count

12

Two), ’702 (Count Four), ’520 (Count 6), ’447 (Count Eight), ’476 (Count Ten), ’205 (Count 12),

13

and ’720 (Count Fourteen) Patents are dismissed as moot.
13.

14
15

Google’s Counterclaim for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the

Asserted Copyrights (Count Fifteen) is dismissed as moot, except as follows:
A.

16

On the portion of Google’s Counterclaim for Declaratory Judgment of

17

Non-Infringement of the Asserted Copyrights relating to the documentation for the

18

accused 37 Java API packages, and on the portion relating to the English-language

19

comments in CodeSourceTest.java and CollectionCertStoreParametersTest.java, judgment

20

is entered for Google.
B.

21

On the portion of Google’s Counterclaim for Declaratory Judgment of

22

Non-Infringement of the Asserted Copyrights relating to the rangeCheck code in

23

TimSort.java and ComparableTimSort.java, and on the portion relating to the eight

24

decompiled files, judgment is entered for Oracle.

25

14.

26
27
28

In accordance with 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), Oracle is hereby awarded statutory

damages in the amount of _________ as to the rangeCheck function, which the Court has found
1

Seven allegedly decompiled Java files appeared in eight Android files entitled:
AclEntryImpl.java, AclImpl.java, GroupImpl.java, OwnerImpl.java, PermissionImpl.java,
PrincipalImpl.java, PolicyNodeImpl.java, AclEnumerator.java.
FINAL JUDGMENT
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR)
sf- 3158625
673132.04

3

1
2

to be innocent (Dkt. No. 1202 at 13-14), and in the amount of _________ as to the eight

3

decompiled files, which were treated at trial as a single unit. (Dkt. No. 1202 at 14).
15.

4
5

Google, as the prevailing party, is awarded costs under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1)

and 17 U.S.C. § 505.

6
7
8

DATED this ___ day of June, 2012.

9

BY THE COURT:

By:

10
11

Hon. William Alsup
United States District Court Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FINAL JUDGMENT
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR)
sf- 3158625
673132.04

4